One Direction had a hit with a song called “18,” but the FTC’s recent law enforcement and policy initiatives suggest that the agency will continue to pursue many directions in its efforts to protect consumers in ‘18. (Sorry. We’re expecting a fresh shipment of pop culture references in January.) In case you missed them – and in no particular order – here are ten FTC consumer protection topics of note from 2017.
Practices affecting small businesses. In 2017 the FTC targeted companies that targeted small businesses with deceptive promotions. A pending lawsuit alleges that New York- and Illinois-based A1 Janitorial Supply Corp. and other defendants bilked small businesses for millions of dollars with bogus offers of “free” supply samples. Settlements with Lighting X-Change and Midway Industries addressed charges that the unrelated companies pitched “free” light bulbs or cleaning supplies to small businesses and then followed up with insistent invoices for unordered merchandise. The FTC also took action against companies that attempted to exploit Americans’ entrepreneurial spirit with unsubstantiated money-making claims. Examples include settlements with Work at Home EDU, Thrive Learning and Lift International, and Advertising Strategies LLC. And don’t let 2017 end without reading the Court’s Preliminary Injunction in the FTC’s case against invention promotion outfit World Patent Marketing.
Health claims. Ads promising no-sweat weight loss, miraculous relief from arthritis pain, easier withdrawal from opiate addiction, and treatment for HIV, Alzheimer’s, dementia, and cancer are sure to attract law enforcement attention – and they did in 2017. Cases like NutriMost, XXL Impressions, Catlin Enterprises, Health Research Laboratories, and NextGen Nutritionals demonstrate that companies need serious science to support serious health claims about serious medical conditions. The FTC’s settlement with Breathometer, a smartphone breathalyzer pitched on the TV show Shark Tank, illustrates a similar concern when safety is at issue. And if companies need a reminder about the importance of complying with orders in FTC cases, a federal court found Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Jared Wheat, and Stephen Smith in contempt for violating orders related to the sale of weight loss products and entered a $40 million judgment against them.
Data security and consumer privacy. The FTC continued to look carefully at companies’ security and privacy promises and practices. On the data security front, the 12-part Stick with Security blog post series offered practical suggestions for businesses based on the lessons of recent law enforcement actions, closed investigations, and experiences that companies have shared about how they start with security. One notable development in 2017 were complaints featuring both data security and privacy counts, as a proposed settlement with Lenovo and settlements with Uber and TaxSlayer illustrate. (TaxSlayer focused specifically on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Safeguards Rule and Privacy Rule.) FTC actions against Vizio and Upromise alleged that the companies collected consumers’ information without clearly disclosing what was going on behind the scenes. Affirming its commitment to the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, the FTC brought three cases challenging false claims about companies’ Privacy Shield participation. While we’re on the subject of privacy – including consumers’ right to have their Do Not Call preferences honored – a federal judge imposed a record-setting $280 million civil penalty against satellite TV provider Dish Network in an action brought by the FTC and Department of Justice, in partnership with the California, Illinois, North Carolina, and Ohio AGs. And in a settlement that pulled the curtain back on the arcane world of lead generation, the FTC challenged the practices of Blue Global, a company that used deceptive loan offers to get consumers to turn over sensitive personal information and then sold the data to pretty much anyone willing to pay for it.
Debt collection. 2017 marked the 40th anniversary of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and cases like American Municipal Services demonstrate the FTC’s commitment to ensuring that companies comply with the law when collecting debts they’re owed. Another important priority is fighting back against businesses that violate the FDCPA and the FTC Act by collecting debts they aren’t owed. The FTC took action against phantom debt collectors Alliance Law Group, Lombardo Daniels & Moss, and ACDI Group. In addition, the FTC’s lawsuit against Joel Tucker for peddling portfolios of fake payday loans resulted in a $4.1 million judgment.
Green marketing. A settlement with baby mattress company Moonlight Slumber was the FTC’s first case challenging “organic” product claims. Emission-free and VOC-free representations were at issue in proposed settlements with paint companies Benjamin Moore, Imperial Paints, ICP Construction, and YOLO Colorhouse. The FTC followed last year’s historic $10 billion settlement with Volkswagen Group of America for false “clean diesel” claims for 2.0L cars with a similar settlement benefiting owners of 3.0L vehicles. And the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in ECM BioFilms v. FTC offers insights for companies making representations about biodegradability.
Endorsements. If there’s a connection between an endorser and a marketer that consumers wouldn’t expect and it would affect how consumers evaluate the endorsement, the connection should be disclosed. That’s been a key takeaway from the FTC Endorsement Guides since the 70s – back when only birds tweeted and # was the start of a game of tic tac toe. The importance of disclosing material connections was the message of FTC staff’s April 2017 educational letters to influencers and marketers, follow-up warning letters in September 2017, and the agency’s first settlement with online influencers in CSGO Lotto. In addition, FTC staff updated its Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking brochure to assist companies’ compliance efforts.
Seals and certifications. In an area related to endorsements, duck-lipped poses in the mirror dropped to #2 on our Least Favorite Selfie list. The unenviable top spot has been taken by advertisers that tout their products with what falsely appear to be independent third-party certifications. Benjamin Moore’s Green Promise logo, ICP Construction’s Eco-Assurance seal, Moonlight Slumber’s Green Safety Shield, and NextGen Nutritionals’ Certified Ethical Site are examples that the FTC challenged as deceptive. In addition, the FTC alleged that the “Trampoline of the Year Award” bestowed by a purportedly independent group called Trampoline Safety of America was really a selfie seal that two trampoline sellers awarded to their own sites. The FTC’s settlement with Tarr, Inc. illustrates a related deceptive practice, the fauxmat: ads that mimic the format of popular magazines and often feature bogus celebrity testimonials.
ROSCA and “free” trials. Offering an online negative option, “free” trial, or similar promotion? Under ROSCA – the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act – you must: 1) clearly disclose all materials terms of the deal before obtaining a consumer’s billing information, 2) get the person’s express informed consent before making the charge, and 3) provide a simple mechanism for stopping recurring charges. The FTC’s actions against AdoreMe, Pact, AAFE Products and BNRI Corporation, Tarr, and Credit Bureau Center and the ongoing lawsuit against RevMountain allege various violations of ROSCA.
Financial injury to consumers. 2017 began with the announcement of a $586 million FTC settlement with Western Union for looking the other way while consumers lost massive money to scammers on its system. Western Union’s agreement with the Justice Department resolved criminal investigations and established a refund process for victims. (The deadline for filing claims to get money back is February 12, 2018.) Federal, state, and international partners joined the FTC in Operation Tech Trap, a global crackdown on tech support scams that tricked consumers into believing their computers were infected with viruses and malware, and then charged big bucks for unnecessary fixes. In Operation Game of Loans, the FTC and state AGs filed 36 lawsuits against dozens of defendants charged with taking more than $95 million in illegal fees for questionable student loan debt relief services. Struggling homeowners were the targets of the defendants behind the Brookstone Law “mass joinder” lawsuit operation. FTC actions yielded orders again multiple parties, lifetime bans from the debt relief business, and a judgment of more than $18 million. The FTC’s action against Amazon for unauthorized charges in kids’ apps made consumers eligible for millions of dollars in refunds. And a settlement with one car dealer and an order enforcement action against another emphasize the importance of clearly disclosing key financial terms.
On the horizon. In 2017 the FTC played an important role in framing the conversation about how established consumer protection standards apply as technologies evolve. The FTC-NHTSA Connected Cars conference, the FinTech Forum on artificial intelligence and blockchain, the FTC-Department of Education workshop on Student Privacy and Ed Tech, the second PrivacyCon, and the Informational Injury workshop gathered advocates, academics, and industry members to discuss how to protect consumers while encouraging the emergence of innovative products and services.
That just scratches the surface about what the FTC has been working on in 2017 of interest to you and your clients. Check out our resources for consumers for tips on spotting scams, protecting privacy, and managing finances in 2018.
The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.
We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.