FTC bounces claims for “independent” trampoline review sites

Share This Page

Consumers rely on independent reviews and recommendations in deciding what to buy. That’s why the FTC wasn’t jumping for joy to learn that marketers of trampolines were touting their products through the use of misleading review websites and deceptive endorsements.

Anaheim-based Sonny Le and Bobby Le sold trampolines – primarily the Infinity and Olympus Pro brands – through three websites. Those sales sites prominently displayed the logo of “Trampoline Safety of America,” with some logos bearing the additional flourish of “Trampoline of the Year.”

What is Trampoline Safety of America? Consumers who clicked on the link were taken to Trampoline Safety of America’s site. The group described itself as a “third party organization” made up of “structural engineers, trampoline gymnastic coaches, professional trampoline installers” and others whose goal is “to educate the public about the safet[y] of trampolines.” In a head-to-head comparison among competitors, it rated the Infinity and Olympus Pro highest, calling the Infinity “by far one of the safest and best trampolines we’ve reviewed” and the Olympus “one of the safest as well.” Trampoline Safety of America expressly stated that it was not “paid or endorsed” by any of the companies whose products it evaluated.

The respondents’ sales sites also featured links to the “Bureau of Trampoline Review,” which claimed to be an “independent research organization” that subjects products to “rigorous testing” on “safety, reliability, and performance.” According to the Bureau, “we are not paid by any sponsors or manufacturers, so our data are unbiased nor [sic] influenced.”

Another logo on the respondents’ sales sites sent people to “Top Trampoline Review,” which billed itself as “the watchdog organization for Trampoline Safety.” Surprise, surprise – Infinity and Olympus Pro models were described as “four of the best trampolines available on the market today.”

A purported “Trampoline Mom” blog featured a comment recommending products sold by the respondents. Then there was the YouTube comment that recommended the Infinity as “the best trampoline that I’ve ever owned” and critiqued a competitor by name, claiming it was “crap” that rusted in two years.

But according to the FTC’s complaint, who was behind Trampoline Safety of America? The respondents.
The Bureau of Trampoline Review? The respondents.
Top Trampoline Review? The respondents.
The blog commenter? Respondent Bobby Le.
And the YouTube commenter who touted the Infinity and dismissed a competitor’s trampoline as “crap”? Ditto.

The complaint challenges a host of false and misleading claims on those purportedly independent review sites. The FTC also says the respondents violated the FTC Act when Mr. Le posted favorable reviews for Infinity and Olympus Pro trampolines without disclosing his financial interest in promoting them. The proposed settlement prohibits a broad category of misrepresentations about reviews, as well as deceptive claims about tests, studies, or other research. In addition, the respondents will have to clearly disclose any unexpected material connections they or their affiliates have to consumers, reviewers, or endorsers. You can file a comment about the proposed settlement by June 30, 2017.

Here are some suggestions for avoiding a review snafu.

Whose reviews are whose?  Favorable buzz can give a product a bounce, but advertisers can take a legal tumble by creating fake review sites, using misleading third-party endorsements or seals, or touting their products on independent sites without disclosing that the recommendation came from someone connected to the company.

Need to disclose material connections? Don’t get it twisted.  If there’s a connection between an advertiser and a reviewer that consumers wouldn’t expect, clearly and conspicuously disclose it. That applies both to raves about your own products or services and unfavorable references to competitors. (The terms of any settlement apply just to the company in question, of course, but the definition of “clearly and conspicuously” in the proposed order offers insights into factors to consider.)

When using reviews and endorsements in your marketing, look before you leap.  The Endorsement Guides offer practical advice on keeping your claims on the up-and-up. In addition, The FTC’s Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking answers the questions businesses have put to us.
 

Comments

These people clearly did something wrong and misled people into spending money on their products. Given they profited from this dishonest activity, why are there no fines or other financial penalties for their wrongdoing?

This sends a signal that other websites that collect reviews, but don't disclose conflicts, can profit with their only risk being a slap on the wrist and the need to behave better in the future.

Trampolines?

"Bouncing" these operators is almost funny compared to the number of fake affiliate reviews in areas such as "make money online," illness, pain, diets, weight loss - anywhere vulnerable people are found searching for solutions.

We have documented our own problems and fought back against a massive fake review onslaught by publishing a study proving how poorly their product (heavily recommended in fake reviews that are about our own product, but then SELL the other)...

http://www.sitesell.com/blog/2017/05/wealthy-affiliate-review.html

Wealthy Affiliate is a company that should be investigated. In fact, as I mentioned, taking advantage of people who are looking to make money, alleviate pain, etc. is particularly odious. Those people lose far more than the money spent.

In the case of online business building, people with goals and dreams can lose years before finally running OUT of money, no closer to success. They lose that time and their own self-respect, often feeling like a failure.

The failure of weight loss and pain solutions is extremely disappointing. I remember when I had severe TMJ pain. Even though I was a physician, I went online to search for solutions.

Luckily, I am a savvy user and marketer online. What I saw was tremendously depressing. TMJ pain can be quite debilitating - you are limited to soft foods. The pain is throbbing at rest, piercing with a morning yawn.

Scam artists play to that mercilessly. I finally found a skilled PT locally who built a false disk with her skilled fingers. I shudder to think at how many hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent by others on ridiculously priced scams.

I respectfully suggest that the FTC "bounce" to the more serious areas where the vulnerable are considered to be "suckers" who exist to be milked.

Add new comment

Comment Policy

Privacy Act Statement

It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system (PDF), and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system (PDF). We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.