Skip to main content

The first rule of credit repair is that no credit repair company can remove accurate and timely negative information from someone’s credit report. For credit repair companies that would claim otherwise, there’s CROA – the Credit Repair Organizations Act. It makes it illegal for credit repair companies to lie about what they can do to clear up a clouded credit report, or charge upfront fees before they do the job they promised to do.

Congress enacted CROA in 1996 in response to a history of credit repair industry practices that often exploited consumers, many struggling with financial adversity. The FTC’s complaint against Grand Teton Professionals, owners Douglas Filter and Marcio Andrade, and nine other businesses the owners control reads like a primer on the practices that led lawmakers to put CROA’s protections into place.

The complaint alleges the defendants violated a laundry list of CROA provisions and five other laws in the course of bilking consumers out of $6.2 million. Among other things, the FTC says the defendants falsely promised they could improve consumers’ credit scores, extracted thousands of dollars in illegal up-front fees from individual consumers, counseled consumers to make misleading statements to credit bureaus about their credit records, and failed to make required disclosures about their services.

At the FTC’s request, a federal court froze the defendants’ assets and ordered them to cease their operations temporarily, pending further proceedings in the case.

According to the lawsuit, the defendants claimed they could boost credit scores by deleting from consumers’ credit reports all negative items and hard inquiries – the records that show you’ve applied for credit — even if the information was accurate and not obsolete. They also promised they could improve credit scores by adding consumers as “authorized users” to the credit accounts of people with positive payment histories, a practice known as adding “tradelines” or “piggybacking” credit.

Using trade names like Deletion Experts, Inquiry Busters, and Top Tradelines, the defendants pitched their products through their websites, unsolicited text and email messages, and telemarketing calls. Typically, the FTC says, they promised guaranteed results and assured consumers that their tactics were legal. The cost? The defendants charged $1,999 to $2,999 for their purported credit report-clearing brands and varying amounts for tradelines.

But, according to the FTC, in most instances the defendants did not substantially improve consumers’ credit scores. In addition, the complaint alleges, if consumers complained or tried to exercise their rights to dispute the defendants’ illegal advance fees, the defendants threatened to sue them for violating purported anti-disparagement and anti-chargeback contract clauses.

The defendants also allegedly failed to give consumers required written copies of their contracts. And, the contracts themselves allegedly failed to include CROA-required terms, like a detailed description of the services to be performed, an estimate of how long it would take to get results, any guarantees, and a statement of the consumer’s three-day right to cancel the contract.

You’ll want to read the complaint for a full rundown of the defendants’ alleged law violations. In addition to CROA, the complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, the Consumer Review Fairness Act, the Truth in Lending Act, and the Electronic Funds Transfer Act.

What’s the message for marketers? CROA lays out a clear list of dos and don’ts for the credit repair industry. If you sell credit repair services and haven’t checked the list lately, now is a good time to make certain you’re complying with each item.
 

6 Comments


It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.

The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.

  • We won’t post off-topic comments, repeated identical comments, or comments that include sales pitches or promotions.
  • We won’t post comments that include vulgar messages, personal attacks by name, or offensive terms that target specific people or groups.
  • We won’t post threats, defamatory statements, or suggestions or encouragement of illegal activity.
  • We won’t post comments that include personal information, like Social Security numbers, account numbers, home addresses, and email addresses. To file a detailed report about a scam, go to ReportFraud.ftc.gov.

We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.

Guest
June 28, 2019
The FTC needs to look into companies that report negative credit information and does not have a fully disclosed time table for resolving billing issues. I have to deal with phone companies and their unfair reporting practices not giving out the correct bill over billing a customer saying one thing over the phone . FTC needs to be on the side of consumers because a company can ruin a persons credit for years.
FTC Staff
July 01, 2019

In reply to by Guest

If there is incorrect information in your credit report, you can dispute it. Both the credit reporting company and the business that provided the incorrect information are responsible for correcting the error. This FTC article explains how to dispute errors on credit reports.

Walter
June 28, 2019
If you watch Armenian TV channels mostly in Glendale, California there are handful of outfits advertising that they can remove bankruptcy and other derogatory items on your credit report. They charge $ 10-15,000 up front without any results, just excuses.
Guest
June 28, 2019
Is there a public listing of these credit repair companies so that the consumer don’t fall for their scams?
FTC Staff
July 01, 2019

In reply to by Guest

Click on the link to the FTC’s complaint against Grand Teton Professionals and owners Douglas Filter and Marcio Andrade to see the names of the other businesses the FTC sued.

James A Jenkins
July 02, 2019
I have been attempting to correct my situation for more than twenty years. The figure is correct. I truly believe there is wrongdoing be conducting at the reporting agencies. It make no sense, numerous calls, social media contact, letters. Still no corrected internet credit reporting copies. If I get two corrected the third has misinformation producing a lower FICO score. My reach found many veterans having the same problem. Actors and scammers target veterans. the situation is so pervasive FTC and Consumer Protection Federal have special website for FYI.

More from the Business Blog

Get Business Blog updates