Business Blog
FTC 86s LOAN MOD TXTS
FTC watchers will remember Phillip A. Flora. In the first case of its kind, the FTC alleged that Mr. Flora was a One-Man Message Machine, churning out a “mind-boggling” number of unsolicited commercial text messages pitching mortgage modification services. How many did he send? According to the FTC, <Carl Sagan voice> millions and millions </Carl Sagan voice>.
Problem #1: The FTC charged that sending the unsolicited messages (or causing them to be sent) was an unfair practice in violation of Section 5. To add insult to financial injury, many people had to pay their mobile carriers to receive them.
Problem #2: According to the complaint, Mr. Flora collected information from consumers who responded — even those who responded by saying “Enough already with the text messages!” — and sold it to third parties as “debt settlement leads.”
Problem #3: One of the sites, loanmod-gov.net, displayed an American flag and claimed to offer “Official Home Loan and Audit Assistance Information.” According to the FTC, that conveyed a false affiliation with the U.S. government.
Sufficient grounds for law enforcement, alleged the FTC — but in the time-honored words of persuasive pitchmen, “But wait! There’s more!” The FTC also charged Mr. Flora with CAN-SPAM violations for advertising his text message blasting services via illegal spam.
Under the terms of a settlement entered in federal court in California, Mr. Flora is banned from sending any unsolicited commercial text messages or helping others send them. For how long? For forever.
The order also bars him from making false or misleading representations about any goods or services, included unfounded claims of a government affiliation. In addition, under the settlement, Mr. Flora has turned over $32,000.
If people responded to one of Mr. Flora’s messages, the settlement includes important protections for them, too. It’s illegal for him to sell, rent, or otherwise share names, addresses, email, account numbers, or other identifiable information he received in response to his illegal messages. He also has to dispose of — as in burn, shred, or pulverize — customer information.
It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.
The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.
We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.