Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content

Under COPPA, how do I know if my channel is “directed to children”? Since the FTC and New York Attorney General announced their September 2019 settlement with YouTube for violations of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act Rule, we’ve heard that question from channel owners – sometimes called content creators. If you’re a channel owner who shares content on user-generated platforms like YouTube, read on for FTC staff guidance about the applicability of the COPPA Rule and how those covered by the Rule can comply with its requirements.

The FTC action against YouTube and Google

The lawsuit against YouTube and Google alleged that the companies illegally collected personal information from children, in violation of COPPA. According to the complaint, the companies collected that information from viewers of child-directed YouTube channels in the form of persistent identifiers that track users across the Internet, but didn’t notify parents and get their consent. To settle the case, YouTube and Google agreed to create a mechanism so that channel owners can designate when the videos they upload to YouTube are – to use the words of COPPA – “directed to children.” The purpose of this requirement is to make sure that both YouTube and channel owners are complying with the law.

A COPPA recap

That provision of the settlement has raised questions among content creators about how to determine if what they upload to YouTube or other platforms is “directed to children.” The answer requires a brief summary of some key COPPA provisions. Passed by Congress in 1998, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act is a federal law that protects the privacy of children under 13. COPPA’s foundational principle is one that most people can agree on: Parents – not kids, companies, platforms, or content creators – should be in control when it comes to information collected from children online.

The FTC enforces the law through the COPPA Rule. In general, COPPA requires operators of commercial websites and online services that are directed to children (more about that in a minute) to provide notice and obtain verifiable parental consent before they collect personal information from kids under 13.

The COPPA Rule defines “personal information” to include obvious things like a child’s first and last name or home address, but that’s not all. Under COPPA, personal information also covers what are called persistent identifiers – behind-the-scenes code that recognizes a user over time and across different sites or online services. That could be an IP address or a cookie when it’s used to serve targeted ads. Keep in mind that an operator also might be collecting personal information through an open comment field on its site or service that allows a user under 13 to make personal information publicly available. For example, think of a comment like this on a child-directed site: My name is Mary Jones from Springfield. I love this video!

How COPPA applies to channel owners

So how does COPPA apply to channel owners who upload their content to YouTube or another third-party platform? COPPA applies in the same way it would if the channel owner had its own website or app. If a channel owner uploads content to a platform like YouTube, the channel might meet the definition of a “website or online service” covered by COPPA, depending on the nature of the content and the information collected. If the content is directed to children and if the channel owner, or someone on its behalf (for example, an ad network), collects personal information from viewers of that content (for example, through a persistent identifier that tracks a user to serve interest-based ads), the channel is covered by COPPA. Once COPPA applies, the operator must provide notice, obtain verifiable parental consent, and meet COPPA’s other requirements. For information on how to comply with COPPA, please visit the FTC’s COPPA page for our Six-Step Compliance Plan for Your Business.

How channel owners can determine if their content is directed to children

Under COPPA, there is no one-size-fits-all answer about what makes a site directed to children, but we can offer some guidance. To be clear, your content isn’t considered “directed to children” just because some children may see it. However, if your intended audience is kids under 13, you’re covered by COPPA and have to honor the Rule’s requirements.

The Rule sets out additional factors the FTC will consider in determining whether your content is child-directed:

  • the subject matter,
  • visual content,
  • the use of animated characters or child-oriented activities and incentives,
  • the kind of music or other audio content,
  • the age of models,
  • the presence of child celebrities or celebrities who appeal to children,
  • language or other characteristics of the site,
  • whether advertising that promotes or appears on the site is directed to children, and
  • competent and reliable empirical evidence about the age of the audience.

The determination of whether content is child-directed will be clearer in some contexts than in others, but we can share some general rules of thumb. First, unless you’re affirmatively targeting kids, there are many subject matter categories where you don’t have to worry about COPPA. For example, if your videos are about traditionally adult activities like employment, finances, politics, home ownership, home improvement, or travel, you’re probably not covered unless your content is geared toward kids. The same would be true for videos aimed at high school or college students. On the other hand, if your content includes traditional children’s pastimes or activities, it may be child-directed. For example, the FTC recently determined that an online dress-up game was child-directed.

Second, just because your video has bright colors or animated characters doesn’t mean you’re automatically covered by COPPA. While many animated shows are directed to kids, the FTC recognizes there can be animated programming that appeals to everyone.

Third, the complaint in the YouTube case offers some examples of channels the FTC considered to be directed to children. For example, many content creators explicitly stated in the “About” section of their YouTube channel that their intended audience was children under 13. Other channels made similar statements in communications with YouTube. In addition, many of the channels featured popular animated children’s programs or showed kids playing with toys or participating in other child-oriented activities. Some of the channel owners also enabled settings that made their content appear when users searched for the names of popular toys or animated characters. Want to see the FTC’s analysis in context? Read pages 10-14 of the YouTube complaint.

Finally, if you’ve applied the factors listed in the COPPA Rule and still wonder if your content is “directed to children,” it might help to consider how others view your content and content similar to yours. Has your channel been reviewed on sites that evaluate content for kids? Is your channel – or channels like yours – mentioned in blogs for parents of young children or in media articles about child-directed content? Have you surveyed your users or is there other empirical evidence about the age of your audience?

What are the possible penalties for violating COPPA?

The Rule allows for civil penalties of up to $42,530 per violation, but the FTC considers a number of factors in determining the appropriate amount, including a company’s financial condition and the impact a penalty could have on its ability to stay in business. While Google and YouTube paid $170 million, in another COPPA case settled this year, the operator paid a total civil penalty of $35,000.

Isn’t the FTC taking another look at the COPPA Rule?

Yes, the FTC is currently evaluating the Rule in light of rapid changes in technology. If you would like to comment on the effectiveness of the COPPA Rule and whether changes are needed, the FTC has extended the comment deadline to December 9, 2019.

Where can channel owners go for more information?

A look at the factors in the COPPA Rule will help most channel owners determine if their content is directed to children. If you’re still unsure about how COPPA applies to you, consider contacting an attorney or consulting with one of the COPPA Safe Harbor programs – self-regulatory groups that offer guidance on how operators can comply with the law. Visit the FTC’s website for a list of currently approved Safe Harbor organizations. For more resources, visit the FTC’s Children’s Privacy page for our Six-Step Compliance Plan for Your Business.



It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.

The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.

  • We won’t post off-topic comments, repeated identical comments, or comments that include sales pitches or promotions.
  • We won’t post comments that include vulgar messages, personal attacks by name, or offensive terms that target specific people or groups.
  • We won’t post threats, defamatory statements, or suggestions or encouragement of illegal activity.
  • We won’t post comments that include personal information, like Social Security numbers, account numbers, home addresses, and email addresses. To file a detailed report about a scam, go to

We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.

A random user
November 27, 2019

In reply to by Nathan

How do you determine if someone is under 13? That’s impossible to do on the internet. Yes, this may be hurting a lot of people, but I’m on both sides saying that this law plays a part in society, but also needs to be redefined.
November 22, 2019
What About Gaming Channels?
November 22, 2019
Slight complaint, I read video games, animation, bright colors are listed, and I have read "for everyone", but here's the thing. I don't know who got the idea that these things are only aimed at kids. There's adult animations, adult video games, and bright colors can be for everyone, not just kids! Not all animations or games need to be "adult" related, many games are rated Teen, teen is not for kids. You need to stop being vague, and separate the two. I visited multiple sources and you'll be surprised that there's a few million people who already got word and they're fed up. I came here to be reasonable, not looking for trouble. However this situation is too vague and it's limiting content creators far too much to the point that every single content creator that I know, is acting more assertive, showing more adult theme nudity in their content just to avoid this situation which they shouldn't even have to! What you're doing, is wrong, this is limiting content freedom, people's art, and their voices. What happened to freedom of speech? Why do they need to force themselves like this, their content was never intended for children/kids to begin with. Get your heads out of the gutter. Thank you for your time.
The Furious Fox
December 07, 2019

In reply to by Anonymous

This is exactly what I'm thinking. Animation can appeal to everyone. What if it has curse words or adult themes such as abuse, alcohol, addiction, murder etc? Bright colours can be used in anything. The entire FTC is a boomer.
November 22, 2019
My channel is for 14+ but my videos could be mistaken for children content as it is a video game This would not affect me would it
November 22, 2019
I have a channel that is for Acrylic pouring and is meant for adults. There are a lot of these channels and we use ingredients in our work that are toxic. Because it is art many of us do not know how to answer that question. Can you please help. Google Acrylic Pouring and you can see. Susan
November 22, 2019
Hello,I Would like to ask why you did these?And yes i know it for Childrens Privacy but there are Small Channels Out there... It would Be Better if you could just make Kids Use Youtube Kids and Remove the inappropriate Videos that Youtube kids Has. Thank you for Reading,i will be Waiting for a Response.
November 22, 2019
You are going to ruin so many lives and I need you to do this 1 thing please just if a child is found just put them into YouTube kids
L&j chillin wi…
November 22, 2019
My main thing is can you specify gaming conternt? Like Serb rated games that are rated e for everyone or where is the cutoff line. It just said gaming content which I feel is to vague and under that you might argue games rated t. Also can you guys rule on loot boxes being gambling. It’s underage gambling for minors if you’re so worried about children worry about underage gambling.
January 31, 2020
Dear FTC, In your last article, you did not mention gaming and did not specify if it was child directed or not. Gaming in the XXI. century is part of our culture, and for instance Minecraft is a huge cultural piece, not only made for kids, however, Minecraft channel owners are affraid that you may consider their channels kids oriented due to the game and family friendly language. Please, clarify the situation of gaming content in the context of COPPA.
November 23, 2019
To me this is very sad. All my favorite YouTubers are going to be gone. Please don't do this. They are real people with real dreams.They all could end up on the streets. If a YouTuber has been making family friendly content for years and they have thousands of family friendly videos, they will quite possibly get bankrupt. Please don't do this. I know these YouTubers, they are good people who don't belong one the street. Please think about these human beings. Please. None of them had any idea this was even a rule. And now they are getting punished. They had no idea. This is not the creators faults. You are a government agency, can't you do something that doesn't end up with thousands of people ending up bankrupt. They are not fish in a barrel, they are humans, with feelings. Please don't think about them like that. That made me pretty upset. This is in no way a hate comment. It's just that my favorite YouTubers, these people who have got me through some tough times. They've gotten people through depression. They have faced so much. They've created fan bases. They work hard on there videos. You may have not have known this, but they've been threw a lot. Controversy. Demonetization. Copy right strikes. This is the kind of thing they have to deal with. And these human beings, reduced to fish. Fish. Not to mention how vague the rules are. i don't know if you realize this, but games aren't just for children. Minecraft, roblox, fortnite. Will all the gamers be gone. Just because there are little characters not only children enjoy it. Most Youtubers channels aren't directed to kids. They are for everyone. It's not their fault that some kids will stumble upon their video and enjoy them. They have no control over kids watching there videos. Obviously some kids will stumble upon there video because of the algorithm, but it is not the Youtubers fault. Animators. Will all animation videos get demonetized. Just because there are animations it doesn't mean it's for kids. Like family guy. But obviously kids will stumble upon it and like it. On Youtube there are videos that are obviously for kids. Like the singing the abc's or toy unboxings. This is what is obvious. But games. Because they have characters that could be appealing for kids. But adults like them too. Like Pokemon. It's a game that looks appealing for children, but lots of adults enjoy it too. Minecraft, and Roblox. The rules are just so vague. Will a video get demonetized become some kids just manage to find the video and enjoy it even though it is clearly for people who are above 13. Will they get demonetized. I just don't get it honestly. Just please. Think about this. Think about the real people who work very hard on there videos. Please just don't do it. This is not right. Please.
December 22, 2019

In reply to by Dominique

I know, and we can't watch what we love and the government f tc will just pretend it is just a safe change but we shouldn't pay for this
Scott Haskin
November 23, 2019
What happens when someone just uploads their Disney Vacation? Does that mean that parent has to be worried about being in violation of COPPA? What happens to content creators that do videos based on Disney or other kid friendly content and they can't get the ad revenue? I hope that the FTC takes things like this into consideration before bankrupting families that just want to share their time on vacation. Is it getting to the point of making DVDs again and mailing them to family and friends? I hope my comments and questions are closely looked at. I'd hate to see content taken off the internet because of this law. Thank you.
November 23, 2019
I am aiming for a adult teenager audience our humor is OK I wouldn’t say anything offensive I wouldn’t show acts of breaking the law Or anything else like that or anything else like that I just play games talk about things post Memes and draw that’s it nothing else maybe now and then I will react to something but that’s Harley happens
December 23, 2019
Please help me how to choose
Anony-moose user 18
November 23, 2019
Yes FTC my question for you is how should you know if something is directed to children under 13 would you go the very obvious route and see if the content -creator/uploader has admitted it and or has it in a title (for kids or kids videos).Have you taken into account that we no longer have computers from 1998 in are houses anymore but more advanced computers in are phone while it way easier for a child to remember a parents email address I can understand that I've done it when I was a child but I dont think the child (under 13) will find out there address just to get on youtube and so can you really blame it on youtube for trying to advertise something based on what your watching because it not very hard.for example if I said my favorite food was pizza your first thought would be they liked this so I'll give the this but with a little more for them to try. youtube has an option to put I'm not interested it's like Amazon or anything other website with games or videos on it would you sue google for children under 13 having phones and searching up Jake Paul and then news about Jake paul coming up when they open it again you can attempt this yourself in you need to show the head you just get a phone that's never been used and search up one thing open a page about it then exit out of the page and make a new one and news will come up on the thing you searched up so what is going to stop a kid from doing the same also every website sets ads from info about you google collects info from you and then uses it to direct ads to you whenever it feels it needs to.
November 23, 2019
Please change your policy because it's not the responsibility of the creators to look for children, it's their parents responsibility.
November 29, 2019

In reply to by Mickey969

Oh my god thank you. Someone who knows logic here.
November 23, 2019
My content is made of for every one adult and for kids
Tyler Schmincke
November 23, 2019
Yeah you guys do realize that while some cartoons are for kids, anime which based on what I'm reading you consider a cartoon isn't even close to being aimed at children. Examples would be One Piece, Hellsing, Goblin Slayer. While alot of kids play games are you going to conaider those channels who make videos of them play any of the call of duty games which aren't rated for children but an extreme amount of kids under 13 play it. Just saying based on what im seeing the rules are far to vague.
Justin Bird
November 23, 2019
Content creators on youtube don’t have any methods of collecting information because google controls the platform that allows us to upload videos
Kyle Seifert
November 23, 2019
To whom it may concern; I would like to bring to light a possible oversight concerning a creator’s content being the issue: someone under the age of 13 is capable of viewing more mature content on various social media platforms. It is incredibly easy for a child to falsify their age when signing up for most platforms by either, 1) when prompted to give an age, simply inputting an older age, or 2) when asked to give a birthdate, inputting a year that would make the user appear older than they are to the platform. Also, an adult is capable of signing into their personal account and then handing the device, now authorized with the parent’s credentials, to their child. Therefore, if a specific piece of content is not considered child friendly, and is in fact not, it would still be possible for that underage user to access the media, all while being subject to data tracking and the acquisition of other personal data, simply because the platform believes the user to be older than they are. Content creators can play by the rules as much as possible, marking videos, or even entire channels as “intended for children.” However, if a child ever desires to view more adult-oriented content, the process would be quite easy due to this loophole in a platforms’ Terms of Service and their sign-up process when creating a profile. Ultimately, it is the parents’ responsibilities to monitor what their children visit and/or view when online, since they would know for absolute certainty the age of the child using those online services, and be able to consent to the child’s access of such services. Thank you for your time, Kyle Seifert
November 23, 2019
Hello I’ve read through all of the contents given in this I would like to share my thoughts on this, I personally think that the fine for violating a rule is quite high I did some research of my own and I think if you did this to any YouTuber they’ll be bankrupt YouTubers aren’t rich and don’t have this kind of money laying around to cover that and I think that’s why lots of people don’t want to continue doing the thing they love (making content) because they don’t want the risk of having to pay that is there anyway You could make it $900 or something lower that’s actually possible to pay off this is mostly because I myself want to start making my own cartoon on the platform and I Don’t want it for kids cuz it’s gonna have adult themes throughout it and I don’t have that kinda money I’m personally still in high school so this’ll be a big problem for me please think about changing it to a reasonable amount (900 and lower would be nice but still)
mohammed nihal
December 01, 2019

In reply to by Hannah

UP TO $42,530. UP TO. It's not 42k in all cases, and there will most likely never be a fine that high, SO yes, in some cases, Youtubers CAN be fined $900, It depends how much the circumstance violated COPPA
November 23, 2019
Hey if youtubes getting punished why aren't the other mass of apps are too? Litteraly every social media does this. Could i get an explaination here?
November 26, 2019

In reply to by Guest

Other services are getting whacked. E.g., with a $5.7 million settlement for the same thing YouTube was doing.
November 26, 2019

In reply to by Guest

I agree! What about Instagram, or FB or other apps out there? So much inappropriate video on IG. This is parental responsibility not a video creator one. It takes a lot of time and energy to create content for everyone to view. Why should they lose revenue?
Elliander Eldridge
December 03, 2019

In reply to by Guest

I think it's because Google threw its users under the bus rather than applying a common sense strategy like ensuring that any of their ads that target children have tracking disabled or setup a sub account system to allow parents control. It's not an effective strategy, just the option that costs Google the least. I highly doubt that such an agreement is enforceable as written,but even if it is its not effective in the least.
November 23, 2019
I'm confused, you have to be 13 to watch youtube content unless you have parent consent. That means parents are handing a device to a child under 13 with their account to allow their kids to watch whatever content it is this reads as consent to me I also dont know of any kids under 13 that can buy a device that will run YouTube or pay a monthly internet bill to watch YouTube. Parents are allowing children under 13 to watch content. I can tell you right now that I have 2 children under the age of 7 that watch lots of different YouTube content and I dont have a problem with it but what your planning to do is going to destroy a lot of the programming that my kids watch which is a sad and the last time I checked my kids have 2 parents neither of which are named FTC. I dont see how you have the right to choose what my kids watch because of adds. Regular tv broadcasting has commercials for children and then the very next commercial is for viagra so what gives, thank you.
November 23, 2019
What if we have an old YouTube account we can’t access in order to make changes?
November 23, 2019
A word of advice Please treat YouTuber like people working a job just like you, they have emotions and it's important to please treat them like humans instead of robots
November 23, 2019
For me COPPA can be quite good to protect childrens but it also have s quite big effect on some of the communities on youtube for example the animator and gacha community will be heavily affected some people i know quit youtube because of this. But this is not the only problem what if someone uses youtube for making money? What if it's their only source of income? Alot of people will strugle because of this please update the COPPA rules a bit.
November 23, 2019
I think COPPA is vaguely worded in an insane sense that puts too much pressure on content creators that often, besides celebrities, do not have a "target audience." Instead of violating the first amendment and silencing people and what they want to create, more emphasis should be put on helping parents regulate what their children watch and educate them. "Shielding" children from adds on Youtube won't educate them in the long-run in the way only a parent can by talking to them about what they see and discussing it as it happens. This helps children learn to determine the fiction of advertisements from reality. I would avoid categorizing videos into child-aimed or not and focus on the real issue; that parents are using Youtube to parent their children.
November 23, 2019
My chennal not for kids
Pristya Calibri
November 23, 2019
Should all of the channel is shutting down, don't let all of the peoples channels is shutting down and keep all of the YouTubers being in YouTube forever UwU
Rikki K
November 23, 2019
I think we need to examine if COPPA in its new iteration is constitutional. The issue lies in the designation of children or 'kid's' content. Stopping the data collecting of under 13s and requiring Youtubers or whomever to label their own content is fine. However, the term "appeal to children" is problematic and curtails free speech. Also, allowing YouTube to self monitor with as yet untested Artifical Intelligence, in conjunction with what might constitute a criminal charge disrupts the judiciary process and does not allow anyone who posts content due process, inherently.
Christina Feigner
December 28, 2019

In reply to by Rikki K

Well said. Someone who is thinking about this with respect to the rights of others.
Claire Richards
November 23, 2019
This is a violation of the first amendment: freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Do not punish YouTube's userbase for YouTube's mistakes. This will cripple YouTube and many people will lose their livelihood over this. I had to delete my channel because, even though they were not monetized, YouTube's system still collects data from your viewers. It would have bankrupted me if I got fined just because one of my thumbnails was pink and had hearts in it. How about instead of punishing the content creators for innocently using the website, punish YouTube and make them fix their broken system.
February 03, 2020
You say "directed at children" which is those under 13. YouTube is not a site "directed at children" No such channel should be so. YouTubes own TOS states: Age Requirements You must be at least 13 years old to use the Service. However, children of all ages may use YouTube Kids (where available) if enabled by a parent or legal guardian. So, only YT Kids falls under COPPA. Technically speaking.
November 23, 2019
I feel like the Federal Trade Commission is throwing Google/YouTube creators under the bus by telling us that if we don't mark our channel(s) correctly that we could be fined a hefty amount of money when it was Google/YouTube that was collecting channel data illegally having NOTHING to do with YouTube Creators.
November 23, 2019
Please seriously reconsider this. So many people's small businesses and livelihoods are at stake. This is an out of touch decision that protects little to no children, while ruining so many Youtubers incomes. I'm only a viewer, biased, yes, but not tremendously. This NEEDS to be reconsidered
Jade Storm
November 23, 2019
TV programs and video games have a ratings system that tells what is in the content. Based on those ratings parents and guardians are able to determine what can or can not be watched. In some cases kids themselves can see the rating and know if they are or are not allowed to see/play that content. If a rating system was made that worked as it does on TV, where it can be blocked by parents for kids, would that help with being COPPA compliant? By showing a 'FF' rating for 'Family Friendly' content or 'YT14' (YouTube 14+) ext. during the introduction of the video and giving adults the ability to block certain ratings help content creators, the FTC, Youtube, and most important the children all get an outcome where it is fair for everyone?
A random user
November 27, 2019

In reply to by Jade Storm

That’s.....actually a really good idea. I was thinking something similar where is the video contains swearing and stuff like that, some sort of symbol could be next to the title which would mean that it has foul language.
Samantha Kowalsky
November 23, 2019
Why can't there instead be a big announcement on YouTube's front page, ads, and commercials telling parents to only let their kids use YouTube Kids? Then, have uploaders who make children's content just upload their content there separately, while letting regular YouTube be for teens and up? Because there are a LOT more adults who collect and review toys, enjoy children's cartoons, and play games for all ages, than you guys seem to realize. There's also the issue of parodies/YouTube Poops. For example, many adults use editing to make characters such as Spongebob or Steven Universe say inappropriate things as a form of creative comedy. These kinds of works are HUGELY popular among teens and adults nowadays. The absolute LAST thing YouTube should do, is to override our manual settings (marking our videos as "Not for kids") with their Machine Learning Algorithm that scans videos, identifies bright colors or kids' cartoon characters, and CHANGES our settings against our will. They themselves say this is what they'll do. That will put kids in DANGER of seeing those adult humor parodies that they're NOT ready for. Isn't the point supposed to be PROTECTING children? Then tell YouTube NOT to use the algorithm. All of our videos should be marked as "not for kids" BY DEFAULT. Then we should not only be able to manually opt-in and mark videos that ARE for kids as "for kids"... but they should be routed specifically to YouTube Kids, so there's no more risk of kids coming across videos meant for adults. Please consider this as a much better solution. Because as it stands, thousands of accounts could be pulled, poor college students could be sued, countless classic videos will be gone forever, and the livelihoods of many content makers can be torn away, under how YouTube is choosing to handle this. So please, not only direct them to use a better method (which they DEFINITELY have at their disposal), but keep in mind with these rules that the tastes of adulthood are not the same as they used to be in this modern age. Laws need to be relevant before they're put into action. Thank you.
November 23, 2019
I am a person who was born in 1997- COPPA has been in effect almost my entire life. Yet when I wanted to join a website when I was 9, I just lied about my age and calculated how old I needed to be to be on the site. Kids today are smarter about technology than I was because they have had access to it their whole lives. I think we have all seen a baby use a smartphone with eerie ease. In that vein, I don't think COPPA comes from a bad place, (I don't think babies brains should be pumped full of advertisments) but reading through the wording, it obviously doesn't understand how the internet functions today. I think the content that is clearly for children should be protected- songs for children and toy unboxing videos done by children are definitely violations of the law. By even this published clarification is still very vague and is leaving a lot of people terrified over their income- youtubers and their teams who never intended to break the law, and many of whom can't afford any sort of fine. I understand that it is difficult to publish examples for every situation, but I honestly don't think there are nearly as many people making videos about economics as there are gaming and film channels, many of which discuss topics related to children. I hope the FTC can take into account the creators intentions and provide warnings before fines so people can actually sort out their videos. I, for example, am a classical musician so I have learned to perform many lullabies, and use the lullabies posted on Youtube to learn the classical music. But they are lullabies which are intended for children by nature- the next time I need to find one of these will it be gone from Youtube? This is an example where a creator might not decide it was aimed at children because it is classical music- but if you see diferently, a warning would be better so they have time to correct it before they recieve a fine since the creator is likely a poor musician. Also, as part of the settlement Youtube is removing children's content from search results, but how are people supposed to find it? Neopets can be found on Google by searching and it is COPPA compliant. If this is a requirement from the FTC, it is too extreme and if it is not, the FTC should inform Youtube that this measure isn't necessary. COPPA is flawed because it tries to sort what children are interested in into catagories and many of the things listed as appealing to children in the law are semi-outdated because the children it was written for are all adults now. COPPA has never really stopped kids from getting places they want to go, and it's important that the law doesn't hurt families (and therefore children) while trying to protect them.
November 23, 2019
Please be clear on your views for Gaming content. There are many creators who use games rated E for everyone to create content. Whether that may be in a competitive setting through a tournament or speedrun; in a creative setting, showcasing a thought out art design being created using a free form game; or a casual play through of a game to help those who have had a stressful day wind down and relax. For example, Minecraft is a game rated E for everyone, but houses a large amount of content not directly aimed towards children. There are many instances of high level player vs player tournament style content, as well as high levels of voxel art and design pushing the limits of creativity and understanding, and plenty more who create content for those to enjoy an engaging story being made for them to disconnect from reality for awhile and relax. Again, please reconsider your terms on Gaming as a whole and be more precise with your intent. Thank you.
November 23, 2019
Is there a way you can put made for EVERYONE? because all my content IS made for EVERYONE.
November 23, 2019
if what I'm hearing is true this implementing this against youtube can put some people out of a job a lot of people make there living off of youtube and a fine of 42,000 is way too much for someone posting videos on the internet youtube was fine before and I really don't think we need to regulate it

More from the Business Blog

Get Business Blog updates