Business Blog
Online Trading Academy settles charges it made deceptive money-making claims and tried to gag consumers
In a lawsuit filed earlier this year, the FTC alleged that Online Trading Academy made unsubstantiated mega-bucks promises about their purported investment training programs. According to the complaint – and the defendants’ own data – for most OTA customers, the only time they saw big money was as it flew out of their hands and into the defendants’ pockets. Under the terms of a settlement, OTA founder Eyal Shachar and others will pay millions toward refunds for consumers. In addition, OTA will have to forgive the debt of thousands of customers who took out financing to take their courses.
Among other things, the settlement prohibits the defendants from making express or implied earnings claims unless they’re non-misleading and supported by written materials that substantiate their representations – documents that must be available upon request to consumers, potential purchasers, and the FTC.
To address alleged violations of the Consumer Review Fairness Act, the order prohibits the use of contract terms that limit consumers’ ability to review the defendants’ products and services. It also bars the defendants from imposing contract terms to restrict consumers’ communications with the FTC and any other law enforcement agency. For consumers with contracts that contain those provisions, the defendants must contact them personally with a notice titled “Your Right to Post Honest Reviews and File Complaints.”
For consumers who took out loans to pay for training, the settlement requires OTA to offer debt forgiveness to consumers whose debt OTA currently holds. In addition, the settlement requires defendant Shachar to pay at least $8.3 million. He’ll also have to surrender the Cessna airplane, the Bentley, the Escalade, the motor home, and six minivans. For every dollar of debt forgiveness that consumers accept, Shachar’s required payment will be decreased by 70 cents, up to $4 million. Darren Kimoto must pay $736,300 and surrender a 2017 Land Rover. Samuel R. Seiden must pay $158,000. The cash and proceeds of the property sales will be used for consumer refunds.
Consumers who are eligible for debt forgiveness will receive both an email and a letter from the defendants explaining the application process. Looking for details about the settlement? The FTC has more information.
It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.
The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.
We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.