Skip to main content

The FTC’s actions against Volkswagen for false “clean diesel” claims were record-setting in size, scope, and seriousness. The defendants spent millions to pitch their cars to environmentally conscious consumers. But behind those low emissions numbers was a dirty little secret – and we do mean dirty: The defendants had cheated on the test. The cases made headlines in 2016 and 2017 and for many people, that was the end of the road. But as a Final Status Report the FTC just filed with the Court shows, the parties involved in the litigation had many more miles to travel.

Volkswagen (through its VW and Audi brands) and Porsche unlawfully marketed more than 550,000 diesel vehicles with misleading “green” claims. Actions brought by the Department of Justice, Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board, and their partners focused on the environmental consequences of the defendants’ deception. The FTC and plaintiffs’ attorneys focused on the financial injury to consumers.

The Final Status Report brings to a close the largest consumer redress program ever – and there are two particularly notable numbers.

First, under the terms of the Orders, the defendants have repaid consumers more than $9.5 billion. Furthermore, of eligible U.S. claimants, 86% who completed the claims process opted to have the defendants buy back their vehicles at a favorable pre-negotiated price (or terminate their leases early), rather than receive a modification to their car and some compensation.

Why are we mentioning the redress program several years after the cases were announced? Because the settlements were just the start of a painstaking roll-up-the-sleeves process to make sure consumers received compensation in an equitable, efficient manner. And according to the Final Status Report, “Thanks to the efforts of the parties involved with the consumer settlements – the Court, the FTC, the private bar, the independent Claims Supervisor, and Defendants themselves – this is one of the most successful consumer redress programs in history.”

These cases involved a small but devoted pit crew of FTC attorneys, economists, paralegals, and consumer education specialists, some of whom continued to work on the redress program long after the headlines faded. The FTC strives to be a “There is no I in T-E-A-M” kind of place, but the efforts on behalf of America’s consumers of three current Bureau of Consumer Protection attorneys – Jonathan Cohen, Michelle Schaefer, and Sangjoon “Simon” Han – make us particularly proud to call them our colleagues.

It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.

The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.

  • We won’t post off-topic comments, repeated identical comments, or comments that include sales pitches or promotions.
  • We won’t post comments that include vulgar messages, personal attacks by name, or offensive terms that target specific people or groups.
  • We won’t post threats, defamatory statements, or suggestions or encouragement of illegal activity.
  • We won’t post comments that include personal information, like Social Security numbers, account numbers, home addresses, and email addresses. To file a detailed report about a scam, go to

We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.

Get Business Blog updates