Skip to main content

The new year has just begun, but the FTC already has delivered its answer to the annual question: Should old acquaintance be forgot and never brought to mind? The answer? If you’re a past defendant in an FTC case, the FTC won’t forget you.

Today, the FTC announced two related law enforcement actions naming business opportunity promoter Jay Noland and several co-defendants. Twenty years ago, the FTC sued Noland and others for operating an online shopping network that the FTC alleged was an illegal pyramid scheme. A 2002 court order that resolved the case barred Noland from participating in any future pyramid schemes and imposed other restrictions.

The two FTC cases announced today allege that Noland is back in the pyramid scheme business with a venture called “Success By Health” (SBH), which the FTC says has bilked consumers out of more than $7 million since 2017. In one case, the FTC asks an Arizona federal court to halt SBH’s allegedly unlawful activities. The other case asks the court to hold Noland and his companies in contempt of the 2002 order, which the FTC alleges they’re violating by operating SBH.

SBH sells coffee, tea, and dietary supplements through a network of independent distributors, called “Affiliates.” According to the FTC, SBH tells consumers they can replace their job income in six months and gain “financial freedom” in 18 months if they enroll in the SBH program as Affiliates and follow Noland’s instructions.

In reality, the FTC says, the business’s structure ensures that the vast majority of Affiliates lose money in the program, as borne out by most SBH Affiliates’ actual experience. The complaint alleges that SBH is a classic pyramid scheme. According to the FTC, SBH pushes Affiliates to invest heavily in buying SBH products and tickets to costly “training” events, but compensates them based on how many new Affiliates they recruit and the volume of SBH products they and their recruits buy, not on their sales of SBH products to retail customers. According to the FTC, SBH presses Affiliates to max out credit cards, borrow from family, get bank loans, and sell or mortgage their homes to buy inventory and build their business.

The FTC’s lawsuit alleges that SBH’s claims that consumers who invest in the program will make substantial income are false; that promotional materials SBH furnishes to Affiliates for recruiting make the false and misleading income claims and therefore provide the means for others to deceive consumers; and that SBH is actually a pyramid scheme. Each of these practices violate the FTC Act.

The FTC also alleges the defendants violate two rules the Commission enforces. First, it alleges the defendants violate the Mail, Internet, or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule by often failing to ship products to Affiliates and other consumers who place product orders, and failing to offer and give consumers refunds.

Second, the FTC alleges the defendants violate the Cooling-Off Rule, which gives consumers a three-day right to cancel certain sales made at a consumer’s home, workplace, or a seller’s temporary location. According to the complaint, SBH pushes Affiliates to attend costly training events at hotels and other locations where they use high-pressure sales tactics to coerce the Affiliates to buy expensive SBH products and services, without telling them – as required by the Rule – that they have a legal right to cancel those transactions.

The FTC’s contempt action names as defendants Noland and two of his companies, Success By Media Holdings Inc., and Success By Media LLC. The complaint seeking to halt SBH’s allegedly unlawful activities names Noland, his two companies, his wife, Lina Noland, and two principals in the business, Scott Harris, and Thomas G. Sacca.

The SBH matter marks the third action the FTC has brought since October to halt an alleged pyramid scheme masquerading as a legitimate multi-level marketing (MLM) business. If you’re considering buying into an MLM business, look for these warning signs that it may be a scam:

  • Promoters make extravagant promises about your earning potential. Such promises are false.
  • Promoters emphasize recruiting new distributors for your sales network as the real way to make money. In a legitimate MLM program, you should be able to make money just by selling the product.
  • Promoters play on your emotions or use high-pressure sales tactics, maybe saying you’ll lose the opportunity if you don’t act now and discouraging you from taking time to study the company. Any company that tries to pressure you to join is one to avoid.
  • Distributors buy more products than they want to use or can resell, just to stay active in the company or to qualify for bonuses or other rewards. If you see this happening, keep your money.

Visit our article on MLM businesses and pyramid schemes for more information about avoiding a bad business deal.


Jan. 17, 2020: An earlier version of this blog post incorrectly identified a defendant in the case. The defendant is Thomas G. Sacca, not Thomas G. Sacca Jr.

It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.

The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.

  • We won’t post off-topic comments, repeated identical comments, or comments that include sales pitches or promotions.
  • We won’t post comments that include vulgar messages, personal attacks by name, or offensive terms that target specific people or groups.
  • We won’t post threats, defamatory statements, or suggestions or encouragement of illegal activity.
  • We won’t post comments that include personal information, like Social Security numbers, account numbers, home addresses, and email addresses. To file a detailed report about a scam, go to

We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.

January 19, 2020
Where is the hearing for this going to be located at on January 27?
January 25, 2020
Ok so how do I get my money back? If the FTC is truly protecting consumers, there's got to be a way to be reimbursed!
FTC Staff
January 27, 2020

In reply to by Guest

Report your experience to the FTC at The information you give will go into a secure database that the FTC and other law enforcement agencies usesfor investigations.

This case was announced on January 16, 2020. You can monitor the case page to see what happens in the case.

Jeff & Mar rad…
April 06, 2020

In reply to by Guest

Took more than 5,000 dollars from us and never received what we were promised.
MLM Junkie
July 06, 2020

In reply to by Guest

Ha ha ha. No one will get any money back. When I first looked into SBH, I read their Terms and Conditions which stated that all affiliates agreed to never ask for money back or do credit card charge-backs. If an affiliate did a charge-back the affiliate agreed to pay SBH over $5000 additional for breaking their rule. After I read this, I felt like I wanted to run screaming from the room. I'd never seen such a blatently one-sided agreement. However, since the person telling me about SBH was someone who's medical knowledge I trust, I went ahead and paid the signup fee, because I couldn't learn any more about the company unless I was an affiliate. I bought a few products to try them out, and wasn't really impressed. Then, there was a new change in the plan coming up and my sponsor told me I should buy the 500 dollar product package, and I'd regret it if I didn't . So, I bought it, realizing that I had agreed to never ask for a refund. After the big news came out, I was heartsick, when they announced plans to change SBH from a product sales oriented company to a recruitment and startup package oriented company. Now, I did run screaming from the room. I've been licking my $500 wound ever since. I've given away most of the coffee. I don't drink coffee. And, I still have some of the bottles of vitamins and magic water in my cupboard. It's probably time to toss them in the trash and move on to the next MLM, and trust my feelings, Luke.

Get Business Blog updates