Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content

The FTC has gone to court in an effort to shut down an operation that allegedly blasted consumers with more than five million illegal spam text messages, including many pitching loan modification help, debt relief, and other services.  The agency also has charged that the defendant marketed his text message services with email that violated the CAN-SPAM Act.

According to the FTC, here’s how the operation worked.  When people responded to the defendant’s texts — even when they sent messages telling him to stop sending them messages — he allegedly sold their wireless phone numbers to marketers as “debt settlement leads.”  The FTC also alleges that many people who received the messages were sent to an official-looking site that claimed to offer “Official Home Loan Modification and Audit Assistance Information.”  Through an online form, homeowners were directed to input details about their mortgages.  They were assured that the purpose was so the company could conduct a “forensic loan audit.”

The FTC alleges that the law violations didn’t end there.  According to the complaint, the defendant marketed his text messaging services with email touting his ability to “send out 200k text messages a day.”  However, says the FTC, that email didn’t include an opt-out mechanism and the sender’s physical mailing address, as required by the CAN-SPAM Act.

The complaint, filed in federal court in Los Angeles, charges that the defendant violated the FTC Act by sending consumers unsolicited commercial text messages.  What’s particularly troubling, says the FTC, is that many consumers get stuck paying fees to their mobile carriers to receive the unwanted messages.  The FTC also has alleged that the defendant deceptively represented an affiliation with a government agency.  In addition, the FTC has charged that email promoting the defendants text services violated the CAN-SPAM Act.

0 Comments


It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.

The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.

  • We won’t post off-topic comments, repeated identical comments, or comments that include sales pitches or promotions.
  • We won’t post comments that include vulgar messages, personal attacks by name, or offensive terms that target specific people or groups.
  • We won’t post threats, defamatory statements, or suggestions or encouragement of illegal activity.
  • We won’t post comments that include personal information, like Social Security numbers, account numbers, home addresses, and email addresses. To file a detailed report about a scam, go to ReportFraud.ftc.gov.

We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.

More from the Business Blog

Get Business Blog updates