Skip to main content

If you say you’re better, you’d better be better – and you’d better have appropriate proof to back up that claim. That’s a takeaway tip for businesses from the FTC’s proposed settlement with Federal-Mogul Motorparts, LLC.

Michigan-based Federal-Mogul sells a wide variety of auto parts, including Wagner OEbrake pads – an after-market product bought and usually installed at auto repair shops. Compared to “entry-level” and “mid-range” products also sold by the company, Federal-Mogul pitched the OEbrake pads as a “premium” choice for crossovers, SUVs, and pickup trucks.

Federal-Mogul print adWhy should consumers buy Wagner OEbrake pads and why should auto parts retailers and repair shops sell and install them? According to Federal-Mogul’s TV, print, and online ads, it boiled down to performance superior to its competitors. For example, one TV ad showed two women driving SUVs. When a truck cuts them both off, one SUV crashes. In the other SUV, a mom with kids in the car does that right-arm-blocking-the-passenger-seat parental move, but avoids the accident. With a look of relief on the woman’s face, a narrator says, “Wagner OEbrake pads can stop you up to 50 feet sooner. Do you know what’s on your vehicle?”

A print ad showed a mom with kids standing in front of two SUVs – one with a crushed front end and the other unscathed. The ad read: “Wagner OEbrake pads can stop your truck, SUV, or crossover up to 50 feet sooner than other leading pads.* It can mean 50 feet saved when you need it most. And when you family’s safety is on the line, isn’t that what really matters?’

Through those ads and others, the FTC says Federal-Mogul conveyed to consumers that in an emergency, when a driver is trying to stop in the shortest distance possible, Wagner OEbrake pads will stop a crossover, SUV, or pickup truck up to 50 feet sooner than competing brake pads. What’s more, when compared to competing products, Federal-Mogul represented that the OEbrake pads will significantly reduce the risk of collisions.

But according to the complaint, those were unsubstantiated claims. Although Federal-Mogul hired an independent third party to test Wagner OEx brake pads against competing aftermarket products, the FTC says the protocol didn’t accurately reflect consumers’ real-world use. For example, the industry standard test – known as the “best-effort” stop – directs the driver to press down hard on the brake pedal to simulate how people are likely to respond to the kind of emergency shown in Federal-Mogul’s ads. However, Federal-Mogul’s test had drivers apply constant and relatively light pressure. In addition, the protocol tested brakes at hotter than normal temperatures – a condition that produces longer stopping distances.

Among other things, the proposed settlement prohibits Federal-Mogul from making unsubstantiated efficacy and performance claims about covered brake pads. That includes any Federal-Mogul branded or marketed aftermarket brake pads and any third-party branded aftermarket pads for which Federal-Mogul provides marketing materials. The FTC is accepting public comments about the proposed settlement.

What’s the message for other marketers? Comparative safety claims can be highly material to consumers, especially for products people can’t evaluate for themselves. When making express or implied representations – especially if you’re saying your product is objectively superior to competitors – don’t put the pedal to the metal unless you have sound proof. Furthermore, the case should remind advertisers that the FTC will take a close look at testing protocols. Companies should make sure their tests reflect real-world conditions.

It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.

The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.

  • We won’t post off-topic comments, repeated identical comments, or comments that include sales pitches or promotions.
  • We won’t post comments that include vulgar messages, personal attacks by name, or offensive terms that target specific people or groups.
  • We won’t post threats, defamatory statements, or suggestions or encouragement of illegal activity.
  • We won’t post comments that include personal information, like Social Security numbers, account numbers, home addresses, and email addresses. To file a detailed report about a scam, go to

We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.

Get Business Blog updates