Corporate or Non-Corporate? A New Approach To Classifying Foreign Entities Under HSR Rules

Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act and Rules, determining whether a U.S. entity is a corporation or a non-corporate entity (like an LLC or LP) is relatively clear.  For foreign entities, the answer is often not so clear. Yet this determination can have important implications for HSR reportability and the applicability of certain exemptions (e.g., 16 CFR §§ 802.9, 802.51).

The Premerger Notification Office (PNO) often receives calls asking staff to determine whether a foreign entity is a corporate or non-corporate entity for HSR purposes. In responding to these inquiries, the PNO has indicated whether particular types of foreign entities should be categorically treated as corporate or non-corporate based on how that type of foreign entity typically operates. To that end, we have historically posed the following questions to elicit key information:

  1. Does the entity issue securities of some sort that allow the holders to vote for the election of a board of directors? If the answer is yes, then the entity is treated as a corporate entity for HSR purposes.
  2. If the answer is no, is there a group of managers that functions similarly to a board of directors? If yes, then:
    1. Are the members all officers or employees of the entity? If yes, then the entity is treated as a non-corporate entity (like an LLC or LP).
    2. Are there outside persons in the management group who function like independent directors (and are not employees of the entity)? If yes, then the entity is treated as a corporate entity.

Over time, this approach has proven burdensome – for both the PNO and filing parties – as well as inconclusive, mainly because key facts are typically difficult to ascertain. Requiring a filing party (usually the buyer) to determine whether the foreign target maintains a group of managers that functions similarly to a board of directors and to evaluate the composition of that board can prove nearly impossible, especially in the context of a hostile deal or where the buyer has difficulty reaching or communicating with foreign local counsel.

To reduce the burden and increase clarity, going forward the PNO has determined that a better approach is to evaluate each entity on the basis of one easy-to-answer question:

Does the entity issue securities that allow the holders to vote for the election of a supervisory board of directors?

If the answer is yes, then the entity is treated as a corporate entity for HSR purposes.

If the answer is no, then the entity is treated as a non-corporate entity for HSR purposes.

Under this new test, a filing party will more easily be able to determine whether a foreign entity should be treated as corporate or non-corporate for HSR purposes because it can reference publicly available information without having to conduct an in-depth analysis of the foreign entity’s management. This new test achieves the goal of allowing the entities with the most information and expertise about a particular foreign entity to classify it while minimizing the burden on the parties and their counsel.

A couple of additional notes:

  • Each foreign entity should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis using the new test, even if the PNO has offered informal guidance before on that specific type of entity.
  • Any PNO informal interpretations that discuss whether a particular type of foreign entity is corporate or non-corporate no longer represent the position of the PNO.
  • The new test applies to foreign entities only. This guidance does not bear on or apply to the PNO’s treatment of U.S. corporate and non-corporate entities under HSR rules.

Prior PNO informal interpretations will be updated as necessary to better reflect this new approach. If you have questions about how to apply the new test, contact the PNO.

Comments

About : Corporate or no Corporate, for me is few times I rode news of companies that belong. To mime work but I had not meet any one yet and my concern in this matter is that I finish reading the documents of about PNO and is require for the franchise to collect all information from the branches that form the Spectrum firm and decent days it very short time, to get in place all the documents in order for the reason I making a coment , am sorry if I am mixing information but is a big deal if you get in place to collect most confidential data in big corporation after Dad wasn't there is going to be a collapse of information , I see this ways, I just hope not but please can you guide me to get a new practice in a this rule.

Pages

Add new comment

Comment Policy

Privacy Act Statement

It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system (PDF), and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system (PDF). We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.