Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Lafarge S.A., Blue Circle Industries PLC, et al., In the Matter of
The consent order required the divestiture of Blue Circle Industries PLC's cement business serving the Great Lakes region of Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin and New York; its cement business in the Syracuse, New York; and its lime business in the southeast United States. These divestitures settled antitrust concerns stemming from Lafarge's proposed merger with Blue Circle. The two firms are market leaders in the industry for cement and lime.
Voice Media Inc.orporated, and Ron Levi and Paul Lesser
Petition Requesting Investigation of and Enforcement Action Against Amazon.com
College Resource Management, Inc., et al.
Statement of Commissioners Sheila F. Anthony, Orson Swindle and Thomas B. Leary Concerning Western States Gasoline Pricing Investigation
Med Gen, Inc. and Paul B. Kravitz
Swedish Match North America Inc., and National Tobacco Company, L.P
The Commission authorized staff to seek a preliminary injunction to block the proposed acquisition of National Tobacco Company, L.P. on grounds that the $165 million acquisition would lessen competition in the market for loose leaf chewing tobacco and that Swedish Match’s market share would increase to 60 percent. On December 14, 2000, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a 42-page opinion granting the Commission’s motion for the injunction. On December 22, 2000, the parties abandoned the transaction.
Statement of Chairman Robert Pitofsky and Commissioners Sheila F. Anthony, Mozelle W. Thompson, Orson Swindle, and Thomas B. Leary - In the Matter of Time Warner Inc.; Sony Music Entertainment Inc.; Capitol Records, Inc., d.b.a. "EMI Music Distribution";
R.N. Motors, Inc.; Red Noland Cadillac, Inc.; and Nelson B. Noland
Statement of Chairman Robert Pitofsky and Commissioners Sheila F. Anthony, Mozelle W. Thompson, Orson Swindle, and Thomas B. Leary - Concerning the Market for Prerecorded Music in the United States
Statement of Commissioner Thomas B. Leary - Antitrust Guidelines for Collaborations Among Competitors
General Nutrition Corporation, also trading as Natural Sales Company, and David B. Shakarian; and the Matter of General Nutrition, Inc.
B.B.M. Investments, Inc., et al.
Magnetic Therapeutic Technologies, Inc., and Jim B. Richardson
American College for Advancement in Medicine
Allied Domecq Spirits & Wine Americas, Inc., and Allied Domecq Spirits & Wine USA, Inc., d.b.a. Hiram Walker, In the Matter of
Lafarge, S.A., and Lafarge Corporation, In the Matter of
To settle FTC charges, LaFarge, Corp. agreed to restructure its agreement to purchase certain assets of Holnam, Inc. LaFarge and Holnam are two of five competitors in the portland cement market in the Puget Sound area. In February 1998, LaFarge and Holnam signed a letter of intent detailing an agreement under which LaFarge would buy Holnam's Seattle cement plant, cement distribution terminal in Vancouver, Washington, a rock quarry in Twin Rivers, Washington, and related assets. The FTC alleged that a provision of the sales agreement between LaFarge and Holnam would have imposed a penalty on LaFarge if it produced quantities of cement in excess of 85 percent of the Holnam plant's capacity. According to the FTC, this provision would encourage LaFarge to restrict the output of cement at the Seattle plant to avoid the production penalty and would prevent an increase in supply and a reduction in price for cement in the Puget Sound area. To restore competition, LaFarge and Holnam agreed to drop the production penalty clause.