Skip to main content

Displaying 1 - 20 of 96

Amare Global Holdings, FTC v.

The FTC sued multilevel marketer Amare Global Holdings Inc. and three of its principals for misrepresenting to parents and other consumers that its dietary supplements marketed for children and adults could treat or cure health conditions such as depression, anxiety and ADHD, and for misleading its seller recruits about their potential earnings as “brand partners.” 

The Federal Trade Commission has asked a federal court to hold in contempt dietary supplement provider Amare Global Holdings as well as its former Chief Science Officer Shawn Talbott and two other individuals over allegations they violated an FTC order in the Window Rock case that banned Talbott and those who work with him from making false, deceptive or unsubstantiated health claims.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
2523140
Case Status
Pending

Merritt

The FTC reached a settlement with Steven and Gina Merritt, senior participants in a multilevel marketing company, over allegations that they deceived consumers about the amount of money they could earn from selling products and recruiting new participants to the MLM.

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
2523134
Case Status
Pending

Wellington, FTC v.

The FTC alleged that Stormy Wellington used deceptive earnings claims to recruit new members to two multilevel marketing companies.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
242 3093
Case Status
Pending

Walmart Inc., FTC et al. v. (Walmart Spark Driver)

Walmart, Inc. has agreed to a $100 million judgment to settle FTC allegations that the company caused delivery drivers to lose tens of millions of dollars’ worth of earnings, by deceiving them about the base pay, incentive pay and tips they could earn. 

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
232 3055
Case Status
Pending

Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc., FTC v.

The FTC is taking action against Arise Virtual Solutions for misleading consumers about the money they could make on Arise’s platform and marketing its business opportunity without complying with the FTC’s Business Opportunity Rule.

In August 2025, the FTC sent more than $6.7 million to consumers impacted by the gig work company’s deceptive earnings claims.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
2223046
Case Status
Pending

Vision Online Inc. and Ganadores IBR, Inc., FTC v.

Under the terms of proposed federal court orders, several defendants in the case—including the companies behind Ganadores, the companies’ owners and managers Richard and Sara Alvarez, and an employee who played a key role in the marketing of the scheme, Bryce Chamberlain—will be permanently banned from selling ecommerce or real estate coaching services and will be required to turn over substantial assets to the FTC, which will be used to provide refunds to consumers harmed by the scam

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
212 3056
Case Status
Pending

Care.com, Inc., FTC v.

The Federal Trade Commission is taking action against Care.com (Care), alleging that the child and older adult care gig platform has systematically deceived caregivers who were looking for jobs while failing to give families seeking care a simple way to cancel their paid memberships.

In a federal court complaint, the FTC alleges that Care’s marketing messages about both the number of jobs available on their site and the amount workers could expect to be paid were deceptive.

Care has agreed to a settlement that will require it to turn over $8.5 million to be used to refund consumers harmed by their practices, as well as requiring the company to be able to back up the earnings claims it makes and be honest about the number of jobs available on their site.

The FTC on June 24, 2025, sent more than $8.1 million to consumers harmed by Care.com’s deceptive practices. 

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
Case Status
Pending