Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., et al.

Tags:

Last Updated: November 8, 2016

Federal Trade Commission, State of Illinois, Commonwealth of Kentucky, and State of North Carolina, Plaintiffs v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc.; FHTM, Inc.; Alan Clark Holdings, LLC; FHTM Canada, Inc.; Fortune Network Marketing Limited; Paul C. Orberson; and Thomas A. Mills, Defendants.

FTC Matter/File Number:

112 3069

Civil Action Number:

13 CV 578

Federal Court:

Northern District of Illinois

Case Timeline

November 8, 2016

PRESS RELEASE: FTC Returns More Than $3.7 Million to People Harmed by Pyramid Scheme

September 14, 2015

application/pdf icon

FTC v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. (6th Cir.), Brief of the Federal Trade Commission (100.21 KB)

May 13, 2014

application/pdf icon

Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment (1.37 MB)

PRESS RELEASE: FTC Settlement Bans Pyramid Scheme Operators From Multi-Level Marketing

January 28, 2013

application/pdf icon

Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order with Asset Freeze, Appointment of a Receiver, Other Equitable Relief, and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue (1.07 MB)

application/pdf icon

Memorandum In Support of Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion For A Temporary Restraining Order With Asset Freeze, Appointment of A Receiver, Other Equitable Relief, and An Order To Show Cause Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue (2 MB)

application/pdf icon

Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief (791.33 KB)

PRESS RELEASE: FTC Action Leads Court to Halt Alleged Pyramid Scheme