Displaying 21 - 40 of 175
FTC Staff Submits Public Comment in Texas Opposing Certificate of Public Advantage Applications
FTC Staff Comment to Texas Health and Human Services Commission Regarding Certificate of Public Advantage Applications
FTC Staff Comment to Attorney General of Texas Concerning Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNA) Regulations
FTC Comment to Texas Attorney General Raises Concerns about Likely Competitive Effect of Proposed Regulations Imposing Additional Supervisory Requirements on Texas Certified Nurse Anesthetists
FTC Staff Comment to the Kansas House of Representatives Concerning Kansas House Bill 2412
FTC Staff Comment to the Ohio House of Representatives Concerning Ohio House Bill 177
Comment of the Staff of the Federal Trade Commission to Massachusetts Rep. Paul J. Donato regarding HB1869 and SB1329
Statement of Federal Trade Commission In the Matter of Your Therapy Source, Neeraj Jindal and Sheri Yarbray
FTC Approves Final Order Prohibiting Conduct by Therapist Staffing Company and Two Owners Accused of Colluding with Competitors on Compensation
FTC to Study the Impact of COPAs
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request (Contact Lens Rule)
LabMD, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
The Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint against medical testing laboratory LabMD, Inc. alleging that the company failed to reasonably protect the security of consumers’ personal data, including medical information.
Sanford Health/Sanford Bismarck/Mid Dakota Clinic, In the Matter of
The FTC issued an administrative complaint and authorized a federal court action to block Sanford Health's proposed acquisition of Mid Dakota Clinic, alleging that the deal would vioated antitrust law by significantly reducing competition for adult primary care physician services, pediatric services, obstetrics and gynecology services, and general surgery physician services in the greater Bismarck and Mandan metropolitan area. The FTC, jointly with the Office of the Attorney General of North Dakota, filed a complaint in federal district court seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to stop the deal and maintain the status quo pending an administrative trial on the merits. According to the complaint, Sanford and Mid Dakota are each other's closest rivals in the four-county Bismarck-Mandan region of North Dakota, and the merger would create a group of physicians with at least 75 to 85 percent share in the provision of adult primary care physician services, pediatric services, obstetrics and gynecology services. On July 9, 2019, after Sanford abandoned its acquisition of Mid Dakota Clinic, the Commission announced that it voted 5-0 to dismiss the case.
Displaying 21 - 40 of 175