When a court considers a case whose outcome may affect consumers or competition, the FTC may file a “friend of the court” brief to provide information that can help the court make its decision in a way that protects consumers or promotes competition. To find a specific FTC brief, use the filters on this page.Displaying 121 - 140 of 145
Amicus brief for the United States and the Federal Trade Commission, supporting consumer's argument concerning application of statute of limitations to private action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Amicus brief for the United States and the Federal Trade Commission urging denial of Supreme Court review in a case raising the issue whether misrepresentations to state agency, in the course of petitioning activity, precludes a claim of immunity from antitrust liability.
Amicus brief for the United States and the Federal Trade Commission as Amici Curiae in support of suggestion of rehearing en banc.
Amicus brief of the Federal Trade Commission addressing whether a collection letter that allegedly simulates a telegraph violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
Amicus briefs of the Federal Trade Commission addressing whether the Fair Debt Collection Act covers collection of dishonored checks.
Amicus brief of the United States and the Federal Trade Commission addressing whether maximum resale price maintenance should be illegal per se.
FTC amicus curiae brief in Rayle v. First Natl Bank of Cut Bank et al. before the Central District of California concerning whether an equity receiver may sue on behalf of defrauded customers
FTC amicus brief in re the Florida Bar: Formal Advisory Opinion on Nonlawyer Drafting of Pension Plans - Supreme Court of Florida (Case No. 74,479).
FTC amicus brief in SEC v. Levine Concerning Imposition of a Constructive Trust on Defendant for Ill-Gotten Gains
FTC amicus brief in Bolt v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center concerning the active supervision component of the State Action Doctrine.