FTC amicus brief in Indian Head, Inc. v. Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. concerning government petitioning and the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine.
When a court considers a case whose outcome may affect consumers or competition, the FTC may file a “friend of the court” brief to provide information that can help the court make its decision in a way that protects consumers or promotes competition. To find a specific FTC brief, use the filters on this page.Displaying 141 - 143 of 143
FTC amicus curiae brief in Stanley N. Parker, D.M.D. v. Kentucky Board of Dentistry concerning use of certain terms in dentist advertising.
FTC amicus brief in Snider et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. concerning conflicts between the Oklahoma Unfair Sales Act and Federal Antitrust Laws