Date
        Citation Number
        03-5245 
      Federal Court
            
  
	  In this amicus brief, the FTC argues that a district court  erred in holding that, because a private association of secondary schools had  been deemed a state actor for constitutional purposes, it was protected by the  antitrust state action doctrine. The brief explains that, in the antitrust  context, “state action” narrowly refers only to actions undertaken in conformity  with a policy clearly articulated by the sovereign state itself. The brief  further explains that the alleged anticompetitive conduct here is not protected  by the state action doctrine, because the state has not clearly articulated any  such policy to displace competition.
      File
        
