The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20260212: The Resolute Fund VI, L.P.; Javelin Holdco, LLC
20260213: Littelfuse, Inc.; Basler Holdings, LLC
20260214: Littlejohn Fund VI, L.P.; Pareto Efficient Solutions, LLC
20260217: Novo Nordisk Foundation; Akero Therapeutics, Inc.
20260227: Stewart Information Services Corporation; Lender MCS Holdings, Inc.
20260229: Greencore Group plc; Bakkavor Group Plc
20260230: BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Astria Therapeutics, Inc.
20260231: Runway Growth Finance Corp.; Double Black Diamond Offshore, Ltd.
20260233: GE Vernova Inc.; Xignux, S.A. de C.V.
20260234: Macquarie Group Limited; TRF IV 2020 (Unblocked), L.P.
20260238: LLCP Lower Middle Market Fund III, L.P.; USA Industries Holdings, LLC
Facebook, Inc., FTC v. (FTC v. Meta Platforms, Inc.)
The Federal Trade Commission has sued Facebook, alleging that the company is illegally maintaining its personal social networking monopoly through a years-long course of anticompetitive conduct. The complaint alleges that Facebook has engaged in a systematic strategy—including its 2012 acquisition of up-and-coming rival Instagram, its 2014 acquisition of the mobile messaging app WhatsApp, and the imposition of anticompetitive conditions on software developers—to eliminate threats to its monopoly. The Commission vote to authorize staff to file for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia was 3-2. Commissioners Noah Joshua Phillips and Christine S. Wilson voted no.
Gateway Pet Memorial Services
The Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint against Gateway Services and its subsidiary Gateway US Holdings, Inc., (collectively referred to as Gateway), which alleges that Gateway imposed noncompete agreements on almost all of its employees, which typically prohibited employees from working in the pet cremation service industry anywhere in the U.S. for one year after leaving Gateway.
Under a proposed FTC consent order, Gateway must, among other terms, immediately stop enforcing all existing noncompete agreements.
On November 25, 2025, the FTC finalized the consent order in this matter.
20251955: Xplor Technologies, LLC; Clubessential Holdings, LLC
GTCR BC Holdings, LLC and Surmodics, Inc., In the Matter of
The Federal Trade Commission issued an administrative complaint to challenge GTCR BC Holdings, LLC’s acquisition of Surmodics, Inc., alleging that the deal, which seeks to combine the two largest manufacturers of critical medical device coatings, is anticompetitive. The FTC charges that private equity firm GTCR’s proposed acquisition of Surmodics would create a combined company controlling more than 50% of the market for outsourced hydrophilic coatings. These coatings are often used by medical device manufacturers and are applied to lifesaving medical devices such as catheters and guidewires.
The Federal Trade Commission filed an amended complaint adding the states of Illinois and Minnesota as co-plaintiffs in the Commission’s lawsuit challenging GTCR BC Holdings, LLC’s (GTCR) acquisition of Surmodics, Inc. (Surmodics). The amended complaint also adds GTCR, LLC as an additional defendant in the case.
Valvoline and Greenbriar; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Orders to Aid Public Comment
Alimentation Couche-Tard/Giant Eagle
The Federal Trade Commission took action to protect Americans from paying higher prices at the pump by resolving antitrust concerns surrounding Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.’s (ACT) proposed $1.57 billion acquisition of 270 retail fuel outlets from grocery store chain Giant Eagle, Inc. Under the proposed consent order, the FTC will require ACT to divest 35 gas stations, which will be acquired by Majors Management, LLC. The consent order settles FTC charges that ACT’s deal with Giant Eagle is anticompetitive and will likely lead to higher fuel costs for consumers across Indiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. On November 19, 2025, the FTC finalized the consent order in this matter.