Legal Library: Search

11/7/91 Called (redacted) and advised that the System is a state agency (non-corporate) and, as such, is not an entity under Sec. 801.1 (a)(2). This conclusion is supported by the enabling legislation...

This letter is in error; called (redacted) 11-5-91 and informed her of such. PS

Exclusive licenses. Valuation of. 11/4/91 advised writer that grant of 4 year, North American exclusive patent and know-how license is the transfer of an asset. The lump sum payment and estimated...

None, but see #9111003

None.

Called (redacted) and informed notice must be given to V (the issuer) and perhaps cc a copy to C to bring them into the loop. Otherwise, I agree with letter. PS. RS concurs. See PDF exhibit for...

Writer told that this was NOT an exempt transaction. WS called (redacted) andtold that this transaction was not exempt. WS discussed this letter with R Smithand N. Ovuka, and they concurred.

The acquisition of mortgages is exempt under 7A(c)(2) and a mortgage is not an asset under 801.21. Therefore, its value need not be aggregated with other non-exempt assets under 801.13, and a person...

OK. John Sipple expressed some reservations about a situation in which someone heard about this plan and bought up B bonds in order to acquire control of whatused to be B. Its not clear how this case...

This transaction is a formation of a partnership not a corporation - - not reportable. 7-31-78 SBP at 33485. Contacted (redacted); not reportable. PS. RS concurs, but notes minor flaws in letter.

Called (redacted) 10-29-91 -- 801.40 does not apply since size thresholds are notmet. PS. RS concurs but notes flaws.

10/23/91 Per J/Ss request, called (redacted). He advised that B was not acompetitor of A, the insurance company. I advised that A appeared to be acreditor of B and, as such, in a bona fide debt...

10/15/91-Advised (redacted) that we viewed the sale of the voting stock as the sale of anentity whose assets consist solely of real property and assets incidental to the ownership ofreal property and...

10/15/91 - Told writer that X would control because meets definition of control at the time of consummation, despite the fact that after consummation, it would no longer have 50% interest.

Called (redacted) 10-9-91 Basically concur with letter and noted comments. [note 1-graph regarding corporations]-[note 2-Does anyone else control A? -No confirmed from(redacted)]-[note 3-U.S. subs...

Called on 10/8/91 - Based on facts presented, the acquisition is exempt under c(4) as an acquisition from a federal agency. Here, the RTC controls the financial institution through receivership; the...

10/8/91-talked to (redacted). Advised that I was not speaking for the Commission but only for the PMN Office, which advice was not binding on the Commission. I agreed that, since the RTC was approving...

Called on 10/3 - agree the letter reflects the advice given [note 1-Attachment]