Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.
Displaying 4121 - 4140 of 4541
Date
Rule
801.1(b); 801.1(c)
On 6/3/87 I notified (redacted) that I did not know enough to dispute his conclusions but that this does not bind either agency in any future transaction. He will send in a letter to confirm that...
File
Original Image File
(931.58 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(a)(2)
I told him that (redacted) is a corporation engaged in commerce through its subsidiaries (redacted) and it must report
File
Original Image File
(219.23 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
06-11-This is correct
File
Original Image File
(107.14 KB)
Date
Rule
802.1; 7A(c)(1)
Since not non-income producing - still exempt
File
Original Image File
(94.75 KB)
Date
Rule
801.2
See notes of (redacted) in reply to this letter on last page-Called (redacted) on 6/19. Told him we would accept filing from C for subsequent sale of A’s assets even though at time of filing it does...
File
Original Image File
(204.4 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1
Told him that beneficial interest in the assets must pass for the acquisition to close in escrow. Title and consideration arent being passed. We dont like the idea of claiming it is not closed for the...
File
Original Image File
(110.53 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
Each partnership is its own UPE. The alternative test for control in 801.1(b)(2) does not apply to partnerships. (See FR at 20062, 5/29/87). Re: Last paragraph if A controlled the partnerships, an...
File
Original Image File
(63.11 KB)
Date
Rule
801.40
We do not write response information letter so notified writer- directed him to F.I. of 5/29/87 .
File
Original Image File
(52.19 KB)
Date
Rule
801.90; 801.11
5/10/87-I advised (redacted) that relative to the partnership and the irrevocable this letter is accurate finding that it is not for the purpose of evading HSR -as in 801.90 but that the last two...
File
Original Image File
(107.2 KB)
Date
Rule
802.40
[response 1]-Called (redacted) MAY 15, 1987. The PMN Off has determined that this is exempt under 802.40.-[response 2]-I concur with this letter. Furthermore, (redacted) confirmed that (redacted)...
File
Original Image File
(113.58 KB)
Date
Rule
801.11(e)
May 29,1987-Told (redacted) that no filing is required - does not meet size of person test
File
Original Image File
(264.6 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
4/22/87 Advised that I concur with the conclusion drawn by the letter & am unable underthe policy of the office to confirm in writing AMS
File
Original Image File
(114.63 KB)
Date
Rule
7A(c)(1); 802.1
OK 4/20/87
File
Original Image File
(77.3 KB)
Date
Rule
802.30
Signed & mailed original (Fed Express) 4/1/87
File
Original Image File
(206.52 KB)
Date
Rule
801.11(e)
Based on the telephone call which established that this is one total interrelated transaction (despite all the separate steps) I concur that 801.11(e) will apply
File
Original Image File
(862.57 KB)
Date
Rule
801.11(e)
Based on the analysis that this is one indissolvable transaction it appears that no filing by (redacted) is required since the 801.11(e) size-of-person calculation results in his person being less...
File
Original Image File
(185.1 KB)
Date
[note 1-sketch of joint venture] - The parties are forming a joint adventure to manage a portion of their assets, not all of their assets. Although this transaction meets the size-of-person test, it...
File
Original Image File
(427.92 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1
See below OK upon later review. WEK 3/27/87
File
Original Image File
(133.86 KB)
Date
Rule
801.40
OK Upon later review WEK 3/27/87
File
Original Image File
(152.48 KB)
Displaying 4121 - 4140 of 4541