Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Rental Research Services, Inc., a corporation, et al., United States of America (for the Federal Trade Commission)
Meyer Enterprises, LLC, et al., United States of America (for the Federal Trade Commission)
Essex Marketing Group, Inc., Westbrook Marketing Group, Inc., et al.
Global Marketing Group, Inc., et al.
Alternatel, Inc., G.F.G. Enterprises LLC, also d/b/a Mystic Prepaid, Voice Prepaid, Inc., Telecom Express, Inc., Telexpress, Inc., Voice Distributors, Inc., et al.
Complete Weightloss Center, Inc., et al.
Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System, Inc./Cappella Healthcare Inc.
Concurring Statement of Commissioner Jon Leibowitz In re Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals et. Al.
CRH plc, Oldcastle, Inc., Oldcastle Architectural, Inc., Robert Schlegel, and Pavestone Company, L.P., In the Matter of
The Commission issued an administrative complaint to challenge Oldcastle Architectural’s (a subsidiary of CRH) proposed $540 million acquisition of Pavestone Companies as anticompetitive in the US market for drycast concrete hardscape products sold to retailers such as The Home Depot, Lowe’s, and Wal-Mart Stores. According to the complaint, the acquisition would reduce competition by combining the only two companies capable of the national manufacture and sale of these heavy products, which include concrete pavers, segmented retaining wall blocks, and concrete patio products, due to the difficulty in distribution of such products, and the fact that both Oldcastle and Pavestone already possess large distribution networks. The acquisition as proposed would result in Oldcastle gaining a 90% market share for the manufacture and sale of these drycast products to home centers in the United States. The Commission also authorized staff to file a complaint in federal court seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prevent consummation of the proposed transaction, but the respondents decided not to proceed with the proposed merger and the Commission dismissed the administrative complaint.
Central Florida Investments Inc., a Florida Corporation, et al., United States of America (for the Federal Trade Commission)
Market Development Specialists, Inc., a corporation, also d/b/a Wintergreen Systems, et al.
Payneless Credit Repair, LLC, and Lesley L. Payne
Handicapped & Disabled Workshops, Inc. formally known as Handi-Tech Company, Handi-Hope Industries, Inc., Handi-Ship, LLC, et al.
Premier Capital Lending, Inc., et al., In the Matter of
ESL Partners, L.P., and ZAM Holdings, L.P., United States of America (For the Federal Trade Commission)
Enforcing the mandatory premerger notification filing provisions under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, the Commission filed a complaint in Federal District Court charging ESL Partners and ZAM Holdings, two investment funds, with failing to make timely filings prior to making two acquisitions. The acquisitions in question were the purchase of blocks of AutoZone, Inc.’s shares in September and October of 2004. According to the Commission’s complaint, the acquisition met the filing threshold established in the HSR act, and thus was required to file. ESL and ZAM agreed to pay civil penalties of $525,000 and $275,000 respectively to settle the Commission’s charges.