Petitions to Quash

Pages

Google, Inc.

Date:
Matter Number:
111 0163
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Affirming June 18, 2012 Ruling Denying Petition of Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC to Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum, in File No. 111 0163 (September 7, 2012) [Redacted Public Version] (361.43 KB)
application/pdf icon Petition by Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC for Full Commission Review of its Petition to Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum and Request for Hearing in File No. 111 0163 (June 22, 2012) [Redacted Public Version] (3.2 MB)
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Denying Petition of Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC to Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum, in File No. 111 0163 (June 18, 2012) (260.71 KB)
application/pdf icon Petition of Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC to Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum, in File No. 111 0163 (April 21, 2012) [Redacted Public Version] (2.67 MB)

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, LLC

Date:
Matter Number:
102 3142
application/pdf icon Letter from Maneesha Mithal, Associate Director, Division of Privacy and Identity Protection, Withdrawing the Civil Investigative Demand (June 29, 2012) (32.89 KB)
application/pdf icon Request for Review by the Full Commission of the Letter Ruling Denying in Part the Petition to Limit and/or Quash the Civil Investigative Demand, Filed by Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, LLC and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation in File No. 102 3142 (April 20, 2012) [Redacted Public Version] (30.23 MB)
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Denying in Part and Granting in Part the Petition to Limit and/or Quash and Modifying the Civil Investigative Demand Issued to Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, LLC, and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, in File No. 102 3023 (April 11, 2012) (60.82 KB)
application/pdf icon Petition to Quash or, Alternatively, Limit Civil Investigative Demand Filed by Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, LLC and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, in File No. 102 3142 (January 20, 2012) (303.65 KB)
application/pdf icon Exhibits 1 to 8 [Redacted Public Version] (3.27 MB)
application/pdf icon Exhibits 9 to 16 [Redacted Public Version] (1.09 MB)

LabMD Inc.

Date:
Matter Number:
102 3099
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Affirming the Ruling, By Commissioner Brill, Denying the Petitions To Limit or Quash Filed by LabMd and Michael J. Daugherty (June 21, 2012) (24.6 KB)
application/pdf icon Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Rosch (June 21, 2012) (4.27 KB)
application/pdf icon Request For Full Commission Review of Denial of Petitions to Limit or Quash Civil Investigative Demand (April 26, 2012) (41.47 KB)
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Denying LabMD, Inc.'s Petition to Limit or Quash the Civil Investigative Demand and Michael J. Daugherty's Petition to Limit or Quash the Civil Investigative Demand, in File No. 102 3099 (April 20, 2012) (58.36 KB)
application/pdf icon Petition to Limit or Quash the Civil Investigative Demand Filed by LabMD Inc., in File No. 102 3099 (January 10, 2012) (9.51 MB)
application/pdf icon Petition to Limit or Quash the Civil Investigative Demand Filed by Michael J. Daugherty, in File No. 102 3099 (January 10, 2012) (5.77 MB)

W.L. Gore & Associates

Date:
Matter Number:
101 0207
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Affirming May 23 Ruling Denying Petition to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (June 27, 2011) (180.56 KB)
application/pdf icon W.L. Gore & Associates Inc.'s Request for Full Commission Review of Letter Ruling Denying W.L. Gore & Associates Inc.'s Petition to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 10, 2011, in File No. 101 0207 (May 27, 2011) [Redacted Public Version] (4.92 MB)
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Denying Petition To Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (May 23, 2011) (274.87 KB)
application/pdf icon W.L. Gore & Associates Inc.'s Petition To Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 10, 2011 [Redacted Public Record Version] (706.37 KB)
application/pdf icon Exhibits A-F [Redacted Public Record Versions] (1.33 MB)
application/pdf icon Exhibits G-N [Redacted Public Record Versions] (861.92 KB)

Carey V. Brown, Credit Payment Services, Inc., Credit Protection Depot, Inc., Discount Advances Dot Com, Inc., Midland Financial Management Corp., and My Cash Now, Inc.

Date:
Matter Number:
102 3175
application/pdf icon Letter Ruling Denying Petition to Limit and/or Quash Civil Investigative Demands Directed to Carey V. Brown, Credit Payment Services, Inc., Credit Protection Depot, Inc., Discount Advances Dot Com, Inc., Midland Financial Management Corp., and My Cash Now, Inc. in File No. 102 3175 (April 7, 2011) (42.31 KB)
application/pdf icon Civil Investigative Demands Filed by Carey V. Brown, Credit Payment Services, Inc., Credit Protection Depot, Inc., DiscountAdvances.com, Discount Advances Dot Com, Inc., Midland Financial Management Corp., MyCashNow.com, My Cash Now, Inc., and PayDayMax.com (February 22, 2011) (1.6 MB)

Phoebe Putney Health Systems, Inc. and HCA Inc.

Date:
Matter Number:
111 0067
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Denying Petition to Quash or Limit Subpoenas Duces Tecum and Civil Investigative Demands in File No. 111 0067 (March 10, 2011) (181.18 KB)
application/pdf icon Phoebe Putney Health Systems, Inc.’s Petition to Quash or Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum and Civil Investigative Demand (February 25, 2011) (4.85 MB)
application/pdf icon HCA, Inc.’s Petition to Quash or Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum and Civil Investigative Demand (February 25, 2011) (3.6 MB)
application/pdf icon PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP's Petition to Quash or Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum in File No. 111 0067 (April 6, 2011) (1.19 MB)

Church & Dwight Co.

Date:
Matter Number:
091 0037
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Affirming Letter Ruling Denying Petition to Quash, Limit or Stay Subpoenas Ad Testificandum Directed to Employees of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (January 23, 2011) (185.43 KB)
application/pdf icon Request for Rehearing by the Full Commission of the Denial of Church & Dwight Co., Inc.'s Petition to Quash, Limit, or Stay Subpoenas Ad Testificandum Directed to James Craigie, Adrian Huns, Paul Siracusa, and Kelly Zhan, Filed by Church & Dwight Co., Inc. in File No. 091 0037 (December 16, 2010) (10.16 MB)
application/pdf icon Letter Ruling Denying Petition to Quash, Limit or Stay Subpoenas Ad Testificandum Directed to Employees of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (December 8, 2010) (238.14 KB)
application/pdf icon Petition to Quash, Limit or Stay Subpoenas Ad Testificandum Directed to James Craigie, Adrian Huns, Paul Siracusa, and Kelly Zhan, Employees of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (November 5, 2010) (4.3 MB)
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Affirming December 23, 2009, Letter Ruling Denying Petition to Quash or Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum and Civil Investigative Demand Issued to Church & Dwight, Co., Inc. (February 16, 2010) (1.16 MB)
application/pdf icon Request for Rehearing by the Full Commission of the Denial of Petition to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum and Civil Investigative Demand Issued to Church & Dwight (December 28, 2009) (3.59 MB)
application/pdf icon Letter Ruling Denying Church & Dwight’s Petition to Quash or Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum and Civil Investigative Demand (December 23, 2009) (738.54 KB)
application/pdf icon Request for Leave to File Out of Time the Petition to Quash or Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to Church & Dwight, Inc. on June 29, 2009, Filed by Church & Dwight, Inc. in File No. 091 0037 (December 4, 2009) (1.86 MB)
application/pdf icon Petition to Quash or Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum and Civil Investigative Demand Issued to Church & Dwight, Inc. on June 29, 2009 (November 13, 2009) (1.53 MB)

Hannaford Bros. Company

Date:
Matter Number:
082 3152
application/pdf icon Withdrawal of Petition to Quash (November 2, 2012) (172.53 KB)
application/pdf icon Petition to Quash or, Alternatively, Limit Civil Investigative Demands Filed by Hannaford Bros. Company and Kash n’ Karry Food Stores, Inc. (December 13, 2010) (1.2 MB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 1 (2.22 MB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 2 (1.07 MB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 3 (664.04 KB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 4 (326.89 KB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 5 (31.74 KB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 6 (117.56 KB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 7 (215.72 KB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 8 (151.11 KB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 9 (91.89 KB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 10 (307.95 KB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 11 (66.2 KB)
application/pdf icon Exhibit 12 (1.64 MB)

D.R. Horton and Lennar Corp.

Date:
Matter Number:
102 3050
102 3051
application/pdf icon Request for Review by the Full Commission Filed by Lennar Corporation, in File No. 102 3051 (March 17, 2010) (956.12 KB)
application/pdf icon Request for Review by the Full Commission Filed by D.R. Horton, Inc., in File No. 102 3050 (March 17, 2010) (451.53 KB)
application/pdf icon Letter Ruling Denying Petition to Limit and/or Quash Civil Investigative Demands Issued to D. R. Horton Inc. and Lennar Corp. (March 9, 2010) (211.04 KB)
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Affirming Denial of Petitions to Limit or Quash Civil Investigative Demands (July 12, 2010) (478.7 KB)
application/pdf icon D.R. Horton, Inc.'s Petition To Limit or Quash Civil Investigative Demand [Public By Agreement of the Petitioner] (December 11, 2009) (9.47 MB)
application/pdf icon Lennar Corporation's Petition To Limit or Quash Civil Investigative Demand [Public By Agreement of the Petitioner] (December 11, 2009) (8.98 MB)

Ever Private Card

Date:
Matter Number:
072 3241
application/pdf icon Letter Ruling Withdrawing the Civil Investigative Demand Issued to Mark Benning and Dismissing the Petitions to Quash Filed by Mark Benning and Swish Marketing as Moot (January 14, 2010) (63.03 KB)
application/pdf icon Petition to Quash and/or Limit Civil Investigative Demand Filed by Swish Marketing Inc. in File No. 072 3241 (May 22, 2009) (4.66 MB)
application/pdf icon Petition to Quash Civil Investigative Demand Filed by Mark Benning in Ever Private Card in File No. 072 3241 (May 21, 2009) (1.65 MB)

Empire Gas Inc. and Liquilux Gas Corporation

Date:
Matter Number:
091 0115
application/pdf icon Commission Letter Affirming Letter Ruling on Petition to Quash or Modify Civil Investigative Demand and Subpoena Ad Testificandum Filed by Ramón González Cordero and Ramón González Simonet (January 8, 2010) (185.97 KB)
application/pdf icon Letter Ruling Denying Petition to Quash or Modify Civil Investigative Demand and Subpoena Ad Testificandum Filed by Ramón González Cordero and Ramón González Simonet (December 3, 2009) (186.2 KB)
application/pdf icon Petition to Quash or Modify Civil Investigative Demand and Subpoena Ad Testificandum - Filed by Ramón González Cordero and Ramón González Simonet (November 19, 2009) (538.33 KB)

Cephalon, Inc., FTC

Date:
Matter Number:
061 0182
application/pdf icon Request for a Review of Letter Ruling on the Petition to Quash Subpoena Ad Testificandum Filed by Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. (November 27, 2009) [Redacted Public Version] (113.86 KB)
application/pdf icon Letter Ruling Denying Petition to Quash Subpoena Ad Testificandum Filed by Paul M. Bisaro and Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. (November 13, 2009) [Redacted Public Version] (113.86 KB)
application/pdf icon Petition to Quash Subpoena Ad Testificandum Dated July 22, 2009, Filed by Paul M. Bisaro and Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. in File No. 061 0182 (July 30, 2009) [Redacted Public Version] (7.39 MB)
application/pdf icon Petition to Quash Civil Investigative Demand Dated July 7, 2009, Filed by Cephalon Inc. in File No. 061 0182 (July 22, 2009) [Redacted Public Version] (328.2 KB)

Pages