Displaying 1 - 20 of 65
Granting of Requests for Early Termination of the Waiting Period Under the Premerger Notification Rules
Granting of Requests for Early Termination of the Waiting Period Under the Premerger Notification Rules
Aurobindo and Lannett; Analysis of Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment
Ascension Health Alliance; Analysis of Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment
Granting of Requests for Early Termination of the Waiting Period Under the Premerger Notification Rules
365 Retail Markets and Cantaloupe; Analysis of Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment
Granting of Requests for Early Termination of the Waiting Period Under the Premerger Notification Rules
Granting of Requests for Early Termination of the Waiting Period Under the Premerger Notification Rules
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and JenaValve Technology, Inc., FTC v.
Adamas Amenity Services LLC, et al.; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
Synopsys, Inc. and ANSYS, Inc., In the Matter of
The Federal Trade Commission will require Synopsys, Inc. and Ansys, Inc., under a proposed consent order, to divest certain assets to resolve antitrust concerns surrounding their $35 billion merger. The proposed consent order settles FTC allegations that Synopsys’s acquisition of Ansys is anticompetitive across three markets – optical software tools, photonic software tools for designing and simulating photonic devices, and RTL power consumption analysis tools. The FTC finalized the consent order on October 17, 2025.
Granting of Requests for Early Termination of the Waiting Period Under the Premerger Notification Rules
Synopsys, Inc. and ANSYS, Inc.; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment
Guardian Service Industries, Inc.; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon eCommerce)
The Federal Trade Commission, 18 state attorneys general, and Puerto Rico sued Amazon alleging that the online retail and technology company is a monopolist that uses a set of interlocking anticompetitive and unfair strategies to illegally maintain its monopoly power. The FTC and its state partners say Amazon’s actions allow it to stop rivals and sellers from lowering prices, degrade quality for shoppers, overcharge sellers, stifle innovation, and prevent rivals from fairly competing against Amazon.