Legal Library: Search

7/26/96 - The writer confirmed that (redacted) and (redacted) were strictly and solely holding companies. (Redacted) holds only 80.10% of the voting stock of (redacted) and (redacted) in turn, holds...

7/26/96 John Sipple advised writer that the effect of the formation of Newco was to pass control of A, B, C and D, and E-1 and F-1, to Newco. Newco must file as the acquiring person for the purchase...

7/24/96 John Sipple confirmed that the PNO Office would view the Order as controlling both (redacted) and (illegible) and, since there is no other controlling or acquired person in the proposed...

called (redacted) 7/15/96 noted exception otherwise concur. PS

7/12/96 - Advised writer (by phone mail) that, after checking with two staff membersof the PNO Office, his conclusions were correct and X is its own UPE. RB Smith

7/10/96 Advised writer that exclusive distribution agreement must contain no exclusive grant of any trademark, copyright or patent. If in the present situation no such exclusive grant accompanies the...

called (redacted) 7/9/96 801.11(e) can apply. The ranch can be excluded since it is a personal residence and not a business. PS; RS concurs- He did not read the letter but concurs with the ranch issue...