The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
Displaying 301 - 320 of 45441
2411004 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
Item 4
Yes, that’s the correct process. Please make sure to indicate on the certification and index that the submission is on behalf of the PE Firm in connection with the UPE’s filing and explain in your...
File
Original Image - 2411004 Informal Interpretation
(720.13 KB)
2411006 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
803.12
Please see answers below in bold.
File
Original Image - 2411006 Informal Interpretation
(881.95 KB)
2411009 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.10
We agree that this is a potentially reportable acquisition of non-corporate interests.
File
Original Image - 2411009 Informal Interpretation
(762.34 KB)
Concurring Statement of Commissioner Andrew N. Ferguson In the Matter of H&R Block
Date
By
Andrew N. Ferguson, Chairman
Matter Number
2023027
89 FR 89216
Federal Register Cite
Type
Final Rule
Date
Description
Final Amendments to the Premerger Notification Form and Instructions
Topic
Rules - 801
Rules - 802
Rules - 803
Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon eCommerce)
The Federal Trade Commission, 18 state attorneys general, and Puerto Rico sued Amazon alleging that the online retail and technology company is a monopolist that uses a set of interlocking anticompetitive and unfair strategies to illegally maintain its monopoly power. The FTC and its state partners say Amazon’s actions allow it to stop rivals and sellers from lowering prices, degrade quality for shoppers, overcharge sellers, stifle innovation, and prevent rivals from fairly competing against Amazon.
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
1910129
1910130
2411001 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
7A(c)(10)
Because Lender A will acquire a greater percentage of voting securities than it currently holds, 7a(c)(10) does not apply. Therefore, the acquisition of voting securities would be reportable.
File
2411007 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.10, 801.11
Confirming that you may exclude Loans/Lines of Credit (1 st) and Loans/Lines of Credit (Junior). To the extent the lease receivables are the monthly payments by the lessee, they would represent income...
File
Federal Register Notice
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension (Pay-Per-Call Rule)
Date
Bridge It, Inc., FTC v. (Brigit)
The Federal Trade Commission is taking action against personal finance app provider Brigit, alleging that its promises of “instant” cash advances of up to $250 for people living paycheck-to-paycheck were deceptive and that the company locked consumers into a $9.99 monthly membership they couldn’t cancel.
Brigit, also known as Bridge It, Inc., has agreed to settle the FTC’s charges, resulting in a proposed court order that would require the company to pay $18 million in consumer refunds, stop its deceptive marketing promises, and end tactics that prevented customers from cancelling.
In November 2024, the Federal Trade Commission sent more than $17 million in refunds to consumers harmed by online cash advance provider Brigit, which the agency says deceived consumers with false promises of “instant” cash advances and locked consumers into a monthly membership they couldn’t cancel.
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
2223051
Case Status
Pending
2411002 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.13
So long as there are no 801.90 issues, the size of transaction should be determined by valuing the voting securities that will be held as a result of the acquisition, consistent with 801.10 and the...
File
Displaying 301 - 320 of 45441