Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Daniel Chapter One, and James Feijo individually and as an officer of Daniel Chapter One, In the Matter of
There is a related federal proceeding.
Advanced Management Services NW LLC, also d/b/a AMS Financial, Rapid Reduction Systems, and Client Services Group, et al.
Google, Inc./AdMob, Inc
Diamond Phone Card, Inc., et al.
Pricewert, LLC, d/b/a 3FN.net, FTC
United States of America (For the Federal Trade Commission), Plaintiff, v. The Talbots, Inc., Defendant
Transitions Optical, Inc.
The Commission charged that Transitions Optical, Inc., the nation’s leading manufacturer of photochromic treatments that darken corrective lenses used in eyeglasses, used anticompetitive practices to maintain its monopoly and increase prices. Photochromic treatments are applied to eyeglass lenses and treated lenses darken when exposed to UV light. The FTC charges that the company illegally maintained its monopoly by engaging in exclusive dealing at nearly every level of the photochromic lens distribution chain. The FTC alleged that Transitions’ exclusionary tactics locked out rivals from approximately 85 percent of the lens caster market, and partially or completely locked out rivals from up to 40 percent or more of the retailer and wholesale lab market. Under FTC consent order, Transitions agreed to stop all exclusive dealing practices that pose a threat to competition, making it easier for competitors to enter.