InPhonic, Inc., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
062 3066
Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Displaying 2361 - 2380 of 3498
Soyo, Inc., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
062-3094
Foster, Paul L., Western Refining, Inc., and Giant Industries, Inc.
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
061 0259
Debt Solutions, Inc., also d/b/a DSI Financial, Inc.; et al.
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
052 3002
FMFG, Inc. also d/b/a American Adjustable Beds, Tranquility Adjustable Beds, and California Sleep Research., U.S.
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
0423155
Actavis Group hf. and Abrika Pharmaceuticals, Inc., In the Matter of
The Commission prevented a merger-to-monopoly in the sale of generic isradipine capsules by challenging the proposed $235 million purchase of Abrika Pharmaceuticals, Inc., by the Actavis Group, an international generic pharmaceuticals company. To maintain competition in the market for this important generic drug, used to lower blood pressure and to treat hypertension, ischemia, and depression, the consent order requires the divestiture of all rights and assets necessary to produce, market, and sell generic isradipine to Cobalt Laboratories, Inc.
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
0710063
Darden Restaurants, Inc., GMRI Inc., and Darden GC Corp., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
062 3112
Lockheed Martin Corporation, The Boeing Company, and United Launch Alliance, LLC., In the Matter of
The Commission intervened in the formation of United Launch Alliance (ULA), a proposed joint venture between the Boeing Corp. and Lockheed Martin Corp. The FTC’s complaint alleged that the formation of ULA as originally structured would have reduced competition in the markets for U.S. government medium to heavy launch services and space vehicles. In settling the Commissions’ charges, the parties agreed to take certain actions (such as nondiscrimination requirements and firewalls) to address ancillary competitive harms not inextricably tied to the national security benefits of ULA.
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
0510165
Sunny Health Nutrition Technology & Products, Inc. and Sunny Si
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
062-3007
Guidance Software, Inc., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
062 3057
Displaying 2361 - 2380 of 3498