Skip to main content
Last Updated
Case Status
Pending
FTC v. Passport Automotive Group, Inc., a corporation, Passport Motorcars, Inc., a corporation, also d/b/a Passport Nissan of Marlow Heights, also d/b/a Passport Nissan of Virginia, also d/b/a Passport Infiniti of Alexandria, Import Motorcars, Inc., a corporation, also d/b/a Passport Mazda, Autos International, Inc., a corporation, also d/b/a Passport Infiniti of Suitland, Passport Imports, Inc., a corporation, also d/b/a Passport Toyota, Passport Motors Holding, Inc., a corporation, also d/b/a Passport Mini of Montgomery County, Passport of Alexandria, Inc., a corporation, also d/b/a Passport Mini of Alexandria, International Motorcars, Inc., a corporation, also d/b/a Passport BMW, a corporation, et al.
FTC Matter/File Number
2023199

Case Summary

The Federal Trade Commission filed a Complaint for Permanent Injunction, Monetary Relief, and Other Relief, for a permanent injunction and other relief, pursuant to Sections 5(a), 13(b), and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a), 53(b), and 57b, and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1691-1691f. The Complaint charges that Defendants participated in deceptive and unfair acts or practices in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”) and its implementing Regulation B, 12 C.F.R. § 202, in the advertising, sales, and financing of motor vehicles.

The Federal Trade Commission is sending payments totaling more than $3.3 million to customers of Passport Auto, a Washington D.C.-area auto dealer. In October 2022, the FTC charged Passport with adding hundreds, or even thousands, of dollars in illegal junk fees to car prices and for discriminating against Black and Latino consumers by charging them higher fees and financing costs.