Displaying 441 - 460 of 1362
App Stores Remove Three Dating Apps After FTC Warns Operator about Potential COPPA, FTC Act Violations
FTC Charges Operator of Crowdfunding Scheme
FTC and State of Ohio Sending Refund Checks to Tech Support Scam Victims
FTC Charges Surescripts with Illegal Monopolization of E-Prescription Markets
FTC to Hold August Workshop on Consumer Issues Related to Loot Boxes
Inside the Game: Unlocking the Consumer Issues Surrounding Loot Boxes
Office Depot and Tech Support Firm Will Pay $35 Million to Settle FTC Allegations That They Tricked Consumers into Buying Costly Computer Repair Services
FTC Seeks to Examine the Privacy Practices of Broadband Providers
FTC Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century Continue with Discussion of Competition and Consumer Protection in Broadband Markets
FTC to Hold July 2019 Workshop on Product Repair Restrictions, Seeks Research in Advance
Nixing the Fix: A Workshop on Repair Restrictions
Operators of Sweepstakes Scam Will Forfeit $30 Million to Settle FTC Charges
FTC Halts Tech Support Scam as Part of Major Initiative Focused on Older Adults Hit Hardest by These Scams
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. (FTC v. Actavis)
On 2/2/2009, the Commission filed a complaint in federal district court challenging and agreement between Solvay Pharmaceuticals and two generic drug manufacturers in which Solvay paid for the delayed release of generic equivalents to its own testosterone-replacement drug, AndroGel, typically used in the treatment of men with low testosterone levels due to advanced age, certain cancers, and HIV/AIDS. According to the Commission’s complaint, in an effort to prevent Watson Pharmaceuticals and Par Pharmaceuticals from acquiring patents for their competing testosterone replacement drugs, Solvay paid the companies to delay entry for a nine year period, ending in 2015.
This case was transferred from the United States District Court for the Central District of California to the Northern District of Georgia. The district court dismissed the Commission's complaint, and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed, holding that anticompetitive effects within the scope of patent protection are per se legal under the antitrust laws.
On 10/4/2012, the FTC filed a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court reversed the 11th Circuit, rejecting the scope of the patent test and permitting antitrust review of reverse payment patent settlement agreements.
There are three related administrative proceedings:
Displaying 441 - 460 of 1362