MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc.
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
121 0203
Displaying 3281 - 3300 of 5016
FTC Finalizes Amendments to the Premerger Notification Rules Related to the Withdrawal of HSR Filings
Date
The Federal Trade Commission today issued final changes to its premerger rules to establish procedures for the withdrawal of a Hart Scott Rodino (HSR) premerger notification filing in certain...
Statement of FTC Competition Director Richard Feinstein on Today's Announcement by Capella Healthcare That it Will Abandon its Plan to Acquire Mercy Hot Springs
Date
Richard Feinstein, Director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Competition, issued the following statement today regarding the announcement by Capella Healthcare that it is abandoning its...
Statement of FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez on the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in Polypore International, Inc. v. FTC
Date
Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Edith Ramirez issued the following statement regarding today's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Polypore International, Inc. v. FTC. In the decision, the Court...
Investment Firm of MacAndrews & Forbes to Pay $720,000 Penalty to Resolve FTC Allegations Related to Premerger Filing Requirements
Date
The investment firm of MacAndrews & Forbes has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it violated the agency’s premerger filing requirements, and will pay a $720,000 civil penalty. The...
1306001 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.1(f)
Update April 26, 2017: An acquisition of co-op interests is to be treated as an acquisition of non-corporate interests. See 801.1(f)(1)(ii). See also 16110007 and 1201002. Agree, this is an...
File
Original Image File
(799.33 KB)
Statement of FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez on the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in FTC v. Actavis, Inc.
Date
Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Edith Ramirez issued the following statement regarding today's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in FTC v. Actavis, Inc., which held that pay-for-delay agreements...
FTC Requires Tesoro to Sell Petroleum Terminal as a Condition for Acquiring Chevron Assets
Date
Oil refiner Tesoro Corporation and one of its subsidiaries have agreed to sell their light petroleum products terminal in Boise, Idaho to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that their $335...
FTC Closes its Investigation into GenCorp's Proposed Purchase of Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne
Date
The Federal Trade Commission has closed its investigation into the proposed acquisition of rocket engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne by aerospace company GenCorp Inc. Although the FTC...
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners, Plaintiff-Appellant
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
081 0137
Docket Number
D-9343
Hospital Authority and Phoebe Putney Defendants Agree to Court Order Barring Them from Further Integration of Hospitals Pending Administrative Trial
Date
The Hospital Authority of Albany-Dougherty County, Georgia, and Phoebe Putney defendants have agreed to halt the integration of the former Palmyra Park Hospital -- now known as Phoebe North -- with...
FTC Approves Final Order Settling Charges that Bosley, Inc., Illegally Exchanged Competitively Sensitive Business Information With Hair Club
Date
Following a public comment period, the Federal Trade Commission has approved a final order settling charges that Bosley, Inc., illegally exchanged competitively sensitive, nonpublic information about...
FTC Staff: Connecticut Should Reject Health Care Arrangements That Would Harm Competition and Consumers
Date
Federal Trade Commission staff submitted a comment, in response to a request from Connecticut General Assembly Members Catherine Osten and Peter Tercyak, regarding a proposed state law that would let...
Bosley, Inc., Aderans America Holdings, Inc., and Aderans Co., Ltd.
On 4/8/2013, Bosley, Inc., the nation’s largest manager of medical/surgical hair restoration procedures, settled Federal Trade Commission charges that it illegally exchanged competitively sensitive, nonpublic information about its business practices with one of its competitors, HC (USA), Inc., commonly known as Hair Club, in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act. In settling the FTC’s charges, Bosley has agreed not to communicate such information in the future, and will institute an antitrust compliance program. The FTC alleged that for at least the past four years, Bosley exchanged competitively sensitive, nonpublic information about its business operations with Hair Club. The information exchanged by the companies’ CEOs included details about future product offerings, surgical hair transplantation price floors and discounts, plans for business expansion and contraction, and current business operations and performance.
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
1210184
Appeals Court Affirms FTC Ruling That North Carolina Dental Board Illegally Stifled Competition in Teeth Whitening
Date
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld a Federal Trade Commission ruling that the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners illegally thwarted lower-priced competition by...
Displaying 3281 - 3300 of 5016