The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
El Paso Energy Corporation and The Coastal Corporation
The FTC allowed the $16 billion merger of El Paso Energy Corporation and the Coastal Corporation after requiring the companies to divest their interests in 11 natural gas pipeline systems totaling more than 2,500 miles of pipe. The agreement provides for the divestiture of the proposed Gulfstream pipeline in Florida to a new purchaser - restoring competition to pre-merger levels and assuring future competition for natural gas transportation into the state. The agreement also provides for divestiture of El Paso and Coastal interests in existing natural gas pipelines serving customers in New York State and the Midwest. In addition, it would restore competition in the Gulf of Mexico by requiring the divestiture of seven pipelines and establishing a development fund for the purchaser of El Paso's Green Canyon and Tarpon pipelines to cover the costs of extending these pipelines to specified areas in the Gulf where El Paso and Coastal pipelines are significant competitors. Under the FTC’s Order, El Paso Energy divested certain pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico to Williams Field Services and established a $40 million development fund for Williams to use to build a pipeline or related facility. The Commission later modified its order to remove the requirement that El Paso maintain the development fund.
20100988: Forstmann Little & Co. Equity Partnership VII, L.P.; Ben C. Sutton, Jr.
20101188: Cortec Group Fund IV, L.P.; Renovare Capital Partners, LP
20101174: Lindsay Goldberg III L.P.; Philip J. Edmundson
20101186: Noble Group Limited; Sempra Energy
20101184: Noble Group Limited; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc
20101177: Churchill Downs Incorporated; SWG Holdings, LLC
20101171: GDF SUEZ S.A.; International Power plc
In the Matter of The Coca-Cola Company; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order to Aid Public Comment
FTC Comment Before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Concerning Demand Response Compensation in Organized Wholesale Energy Markets (Docket No. RM10-17-000)
Novartis AG, In the Matter of (Alcon, Inc)
To settle FTC charges that its proposed acquisition of Alcon, Inc., would be anticompetitive, Novartis AG agreed to sell an injectable eye care drug used in cataract surgery. Novartis and Alcon are the only two U.S. providers of the class of drugs known as injectable miotics, and the FTC alleges that the acquisition would have created a monopoly in injectable miotics. The settlement requires Novartis to sell its drug Miochol-E to Bausch & Lomb, Inc.