The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
United Healthcare Services Inc. v. Gilead Sciences Inc., et al. (In re HIV)
CarShield
In July 2024, NRRM, LLC, which does business as CarShield, along with American Auto Shield, LLC, the administrator of its vehicle service contracts, agreed to pay $10 million to settle FTC charges that its advertisements and telemarketing for VSC are deceptive and misleading, and that many purchasers found that many repairs were not “covered,” despite making payments of up to $120 per month. The FTC also alleges CarShield’s celebrity and consumer endorsers made false statements in its ads.
Statement of FTC Bureau of Competition Deputy Director Rahul Rao on Lawsuit Against PBMs and the Role of Drug Manufacturers in Distorting Competition in the U.S Drug Distribution System
Statement of Commissioner Alvaro M. Bedoya On the 6(b) Report Examining the Data Practices of Social Media and Video Streaming Services
Statement of Chair Lina M. Khan Regarding the Social Media and Video Streaming Service Providers Privacy Report
Concurring and Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Andrew N. Ferguson Regarding the Social Media and Video Streaming Services Report
Concurring and Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Melissa Holyoak Regarding the Social Media and Video Streaming Services Staff Report
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., Norton (Waterford) Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. FTC, et al.
2409001 Informal Interpretation
Natalia Lynch, In the Matter of
20241895: Lifespan Corporation; Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
20241895: Lifespan Corporation; MIP V Hopkins RH, L.P.
20241923: BMC Health System, Inc.; Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
20241924: BMC Health System, Inc.; MIP V Hopkins RH, L.P.
W. Bret Calhoun, In the Matter of
Chris Allen Hartman, In the Matter of
2409009 Informal Interpretation
Weblio
At the FTC’s request, a federal court has temporarily halted the operation of a sprawling business opportunity scheme that has taken in millions of dollars from consumers with bogus promises of huge returns. The scheme has operated since at least 2018 under a number of names, including “Blueprint to Wealth,” according to the FTC’s complaint. Three individuals -- Samuel James Smith, Robert William Shafer and Charles Joseph Garis, Jr. -- and a company owned by one of them -- Business Revolution Group -- are charged in the complaint with operating the scheme.
The defendants in the case agreed to settlements with the FTC that include monetary judgements, industry bans, and prohibitions on certain conduct.