The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
Displaying 541 - 560 of 45580
Statement of Chair Lina M. Khan Regarding the Social Media and Video Streaming Service Providers Privacy Report
Date
By
Lina M. Khan, Former Chair and Commissioner
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., Norton (Waterford) Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. FTC, et al.
Date
Citation Number
24-1936
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2409001 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.2
In a consolidation shareholder backside, there is only an A side filing – we look to the filings for the consolidation for the Newco information.
File
Original Image - 2409001 Informal Interpretation
(710.07 KB)
Natalia Lynch, In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9423
Case Status
Closed
20241895: Lifespan Corporation; Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Date
Acquiring Party
Lifespan Corporation
Acquired Party
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Acquired Entities
MPT of Fall River-Steward, LLC|MPT of Taunton-Steward, LLC
20241895: Lifespan Corporation; MIP V Hopkins RH, L.P.
Date
Acquiring Party
Lifespan Corporation
Acquired Party
MIP V Hopkins RH, L.P.
Acquired Entities
MPT of Fall River-Steward, LLC|MPT of Taunton-Steward, LLC
20241923: BMC Health System, Inc.; Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Date
Acquiring Party
BMC Health System, Inc.
Acquired Party
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Acquired Entities
MPT of Brockton Steward, LLC
20241924: BMC Health System, Inc.; MIP V Hopkins RH, L.P.
Date
Acquiring Party
BMC Health System, Inc.
Acquired Party
MIP V Hopkins RH, L.P.
Acquired Entities
MPT of Brockton Steward, LLC
Chris Allen Hartman, In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9432
Case Status
Closed
W. Bret Calhoun, In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9430
Case Status
Closed
2409009 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.2
You can indicate in Item 1(a) or in an endnote that the UPE is a husband and wife. Yes, one can certify on behalf of both.
File
Original Image - 2409009 Informal Interpretation
(148.96 KB)
Weblio
At the FTC’s request, a federal court has temporarily halted the operation of a sprawling business opportunity scheme that has taken in millions of dollars from consumers with bogus promises of huge returns. The scheme has operated since at least 2018 under a number of names, including “Blueprint to Wealth,” according to the FTC’s complaint. Three individuals -- Samuel James Smith, Robert William Shafer and Charles Joseph Garis, Jr. -- and a company owned by one of them -- Business Revolution Group -- are charged in the complaint with operating the scheme.
The defendants in the case agreed to settlements with the FTC that include monetary judgements, industry bans, and prohibitions on certain conduct.
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
Case Status
Pending
2409007 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
Item 4
Confirmed.
File
Original Image - 2409007 Informal Interpretation
(542.35 KB)
2409008 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.1
Based on the facts provided, we agree that Sponsor is not a UPE of Buyer Corp. That said, it is worth mentioning that any ownership arrangement designed to evade the requirements of the HSR Act runs...
File
Original Image - 2409008 Informal Interpretation
(656.97 KB)
2409003 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
803.9
Thanks for your patience. The parties and their counsel should evaluate whether there is a substantial enough risk that a WCA like this one will affect the fee owed. If so, then they should pay the...
File
Original Image - 2409003 Informal Interpretation
(766.51 KB)
Displaying 541 - 560 of 45580