Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.21
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
File Number
9805013
Response/Comments
Called (redacted) 5/22/98. I concur.

Question

Patrick Sharpe
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washing ton, D.C. 20580

                        Re:      Nonreportability of Transaction Under HSR Act

Dear Patrick:

            This letter will confirm our telephone conversation last week in which you indicated that the following transaction would not be reportable under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (“HSR Act”), as codified at 15 U.S.C. § 18a and the rules promulgated thereunder:

 

Company A, which is its own ultimate parent entity for HSR Act purposes, is merging with Company B, which is also its own parent entity. 1 Company C, which is its own ultimate parent entity, currently owns approximately 46.5% of the common voting securities of Company A. As a result of the merger, Company C’s holdings of the voting securities of Company A would be approximately 24.6%. At the same closing as the merger (but, for a variety of business reasons, immediately following the merger), Company C will purchase from Company D, which is its own

ultimate parent entity, approximately 18% of the voting securities of Company A. The occurrence of the merger and stock purchase are conditioned upon each other occurring. After the transactions contemplated by the merger Agreement, Company C will hold 34.2% of the voting securities of Company A.

Company A and Company C filed HSR notifications in October 1994 for meeting or exceeding the 25% threshold, in contemplation of Company C, through open market stock purchases, increasing its holdings of Company A common voting securities from 46.5% up to, but not meeting or exceeding 50%. 2 Company C did not make these purchases, however.

            As we discussed, even though Company C did not acquire any additional voting securities in connection with the October 1994 HSR notification following the termination of the pertinent HSR waiting period, given Company A’s ownership of 46.5% of Company A’s voting securities at such time, Company C automatically satisfied 16 C.F.R. § 802.21 [Note: agree] for purchases of up to, but not meeting or exceeding, 50% of Company A’s voting securities. Under 6 C.F.R. § 802.21 Company C has 5 years to complete the acquisition of voting securities up to, but not meeting or exceeding, the 50% threshold from the date upon which the HSR waiting period expired or terminated in connection with the October 1994 HSR notification. Accordingly, so long as Company C acquires the voting securities described above from company D, within such 5-year time period, no* [Note: *agree] HSR filing would be required for the transaction.

            Please let me know immediately if I have misunderstood your analysis or your conclusions regarding the above described transaction. As always, I appreciate your very valuable assistance in these matters.

                                                                                    Best regards,

                                                                                    (redacted)

A HSR filing will be made by company A and Company B with respect to the merger.[Note: OK]

Company C had been Company A’s ultimate parent entity from its inception until theearly 1990's, when Company C arranged for an initial public offering (not legible) of Company A,which IPO decreased Company C’s holdings by Company A voting securities to the 46.5% level.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from PNO staff on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. They do not necessarily reflect the position of the Commission. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice. 

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.