Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.1
Staff
Andrew Scanlon
Response/Comments
See below

Question

(redacted)

February 14, 1986

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Mr. Andrew Scanlon
Compliance Specialist
Federal Trade Commission -
Pre-Merger Notification Office
Room 301
6th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: (redacted) Limited/Exemption from Hart-Scott-Rodino
Pre-Merger Notification Requirements

Dear Mr. Scanlon:

Responsive to our telephone conversation of Friday, February 14, we are pleased to supplement our letter of February 11, 1986 with the following information:

1. The seven manufacturing warehouse projects located in the States of California, Tennessee, Indiana, Illinois, Maryland and Missouri are occupied by either (redacted) utilize the warehouse properties for the operation of their respective businesses. The only relationship between the Partnership and these warehouse projects will be that of a lessor of real property.

2. Upon completion of the Exchange Transaction, the Partnership (like its predecessors-in-interest) will not be engaged in any manufacturing business nor the operation of any warehouse business.

We understand that unless we hear from you to the contrary after you receipt of this letter, the Partnership may proceed with the Exchange Transaction without any obligation of any kind to file a pre-merger notification under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.

We greatly appreciate your expeditious consideration of this matter.

Yours very truly,

(redacted)

(redacted)

NO STAFF COMMENTS

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.