Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Thoratec Corporation, and HeartWare International, Inc., In the Matter of
The Commission authorized a preliminary injunction to block Thoratec Corporation’s proposed $282 million acquisition of rival medical device maker HeartWare International, Inc., charging that the transaction would substantially reduce competition in the U.S. market for left ventricular devices (LVADs), a life-sustaining treatment for patients with advanced heart failure. The FTC’s administrative complaint alleges that Thoratec seeks to maintain its monopoly by acquiring HeartWare, thus eliminating the only significant threat to Thoratec’s continued dominance of the LVAD market. In August of 2009, the parties announced they would not to proceed with the proposed acquisition, and the Commission dismissed the Administrative Complaint without filing an motion for preliminary injunction in federal court.
Concurring Statement of Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch Crude Oil Price Manipulation Rule Making, Project No. P082900
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner William E. Kovacic Crude Oil Price Manipulation Rule Making, Project No. P082900
Statement of Chairman Leibowitz Crude Oil Price Manipulation Rule Making, Project No. P082900
Odysseus Marketing, Inc., and Walter Rines
Global Mortgage Funding, Inc., et al., United States of America (for the FTC)
Berkeley Premium Nutraceuticals, Inc., et al.
Warshak, Steve; Berkeley Premium Nutraceuticals, Inc., Lifekey, Inc., Warner Health Care, Inc., and Wagner Nutraceuticals, Inc., et al.
Tender Corporation, a corporation, in the Matter of
Kmart Corporation, in the Matter of
Foreclosure Solutions, LLC, and Timothy A. Buckley
Alta Bates Medical Group, Inc.
Alta Bates Medical Group, Inc., a 600-physician independent practice association serving the Berkeley and Oakland, California, area, settleed Commission charges that it violated federal antitrust law by fixing prices charged to health care insurers. The consent order prohibits Alta Bates from collectively negotiating fee-for-service reimbursements and engaging in related anticompetitive conduct. In addition to price-fixing of fee-for-service reimbursements, the FTC’s complaint alleges an unlawful concerted refusal to deal.