Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Jonas, Diane M.; Paul A. Jonas, James W. Raim d/b/a Market Systems, Ltd., Robert B. Roemer, and The Business Opportunity Center, Inc.
General Mills, Inc., In the Matter of
Consent order preserves competition in ready-to-eat cereals. The order permits the acquisition of Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.'s branded ready-to-eat cereal and snack mix business but requires the transfer of licenses to manufacture and sell cereals identical to the Chex brand products without the approval of General Mills.
Statement of Chairman Robert Pitofsky and Commissioners Janet D. Steiger and Christine A. Varney - In the Matter of Cadence Design Systems, Inc./ Cooper & Chyan Technology, Inc.
Statement of Commissioner Mary L. Azcuenaga Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part - In Matter of Cadence Design Systems, Inc
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Starek - In the Matter of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Cooper & Chyan Technology, Inc.
Money Tree, The, Inc., and Vance R. Martin, In the Matter of
Splitfire, Inc., In the Matter of
Nationwide Syndications, Inc., and Thomas W. Karon., In the Matter of
Statement of Commissioner Roscoe B. Starek, III Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part in America Online, Inc
International Direct, Inc. and American Security Products, Inc., et al.
Herb Gordon Auto World, Inc., et al., In the Matter of
Huling Bros. Chevrolet, Inc.; Huling Buick, Inc.; and Huling Bros. Chrysler/Plymouth, Inc., In the Matter of
Red Apple Companies, Inc., John A. Catsimatidis, Supermarket Acquisition Corporation, and DesignCraft Industries, Inc.
Uno Restaurant Corporation, Pizzeria Uno Corporation, and Uno Restaurants, Inc., In the Matter of
Staples, Inc. and Office Depot, Inc.
Staff authorized to file a motion for a preliminary injunction to block the proposed acquisition of Office Depot, 1nc. on grounds that the $4 billion acquisition would allow the combined firm to control prices for the sale of office supplies in numerous metropolitan areas in the United States. On June 30, 1997, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted the Commission's motion for the injunction. Staples abandoned its acquisition plans in July 1997.