Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Capitol Records, Inc., d/b/a EMI Music Distribution, et al., In the Matter of
Universal Music & Video Distribution Corp.and UMG Recordings, Inc.
The FTC charged that five distributors of recorded music illegally required retailers to advertise compact discs at or above the minimum advertised price (MAP) set by the distribution company in exchange for substantial advertising payments for various types of media including television, radio, newspaper and signs and banners within the retailers own stores. Time-Warner Inc., Bertlesmann, Universal Music and Video Distribution Corporation and UMG Recordings, Inc., EMI Music Distribution, and Sony Music Entertainment represent approximately 85 percent of all CD’s purchased in the United States. According to the complaint, the MAP policies violated the antitrust laws in two respects. First, when considered together, the arrangements constitute practices that facilitate horizontal collusion among the distributors, and, when viewed individually, each distributor's arrangement constitutes an unreasonable vertical restraint of trade under the rule of reason. In separate settlements, each distributor agreed to stop linking promotional funds to the advertised prices of their retailer customers for the next seven years. For the next 13 years after that, each company was prohibited from conditioning promotional money on the prices contained in advertisements they do not pay for, or terminating relationships with any retailer based on that retailer's prices.
Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.
Time Warner Inc.
Statement of Chairman Robert Pitofsky and Commissioners Sheila F. Anthony, Mozelle W. Thompson, Orson Swindle, and Thomas B. Leary - In the Matter of Time Warner Inc.; Sony Music Entertainment Inc.; Capitol Records, Inc., d.b.a. "EMI Music Distribution";
American Bioscience, Inc., v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and Does 1- through 10, Inc.lusive
Swedish Match North America, Inc.
Swisher International, Inc.
General Cigar Holdings, Inc.
Havatampa, Inc.
John Middleton, Inc.
Performance Capital Management, Inc.
Action Loan Company, Inc., et al.
American International Travel Services, Inc., et al.
Med Resorts International, Inc., et al., FTC and The Commonwealth of Virgini
Novartis Corporation and Novartis Consumer Health, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals Opinion Denying Novartis's Petition for Review of Final Order of the Commission (D.C. Cir. August 18, 2000)