8301006 Informal Interpretation

Marianne Dunaitus



January 11, 1983

Marianne Dunaitis, Esquire
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: Request for Informal Interpretation under Hart-Scott-Rodino Act Antitrust Improvements Act

Dear Ms. Dunaitis:

I am writing as a follow-up to my letter of December 20, 1982, and to

confirm our telephone conversation of January 7, 1983.

By way of clarification of my letter of December 20, 1982, the class Z

preferred owned by Company A is entitled to elect five of the nine directors of

Company B. In addition to its ownership of 100% of class 2 preferred of Company

B, Company A also owns approximately 20% of the outstanding common stock of

Company B, which is entitled to elect four of the nine directors of Company B. As a

result, under the formula to which you referred in our telephone conversation, the

total combined voting power of Company a with respect to Company B would be

computed as follows:

1. 260,000 class Z shares held

by Company A X 5total number of directors elected by Class Z = 55.55%

260,000 total class Z shares 9total number of directors of Company B


2. 20% of total common stock

by Company A X 4total number of directors elected by common = 8.89%

100% of total common 9total number of directors of Company B


3. Total voting power of Company

with respect to election of Directors=Approximately 64.4%

Of company B

According, inasmuch as Company A is already in control of Company B as a

result of its existing holding of class Z preferred stock of Company B, Company A will

not be required to file under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act in the

event it makes additional open market purchases of common stock of Company B.

I very much appreciate your assistance in this matter. If I can provide you

with any further required information, please do not hesitate to call or write.


About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.