Displaying 4741 - 4760 of 5085
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., In the Matter of
Consent order settles charges that New Balance fixed and controlled the resale prices of its shoes in an effort to raise retail prices for its athletic footwear. According to the complaint, New Balance entered into agreements with some of its retailers to restrict price competition, and threatened to terminate or suspend shipments to retailers who did not abide by the pricing restrictions.
Raytheon Company
Precision Moulding Co., Inc.
Foodmaker To Pay $1.45 Million To Settle Federal Charges over Chi-Chi's Acquisition of Consul
Dell Computer Corporation
Titan To Pay Maximum $130,000 Civil Penalty To Settle Federal Charges Over Acquisition from Pirelli Armstrong
Anticipating the 21st Century: Competition and Consumer Protection Policy in the New High-Tech, Global Marketplace
The Problem with Baker Hughes and Syufy: On the Role of Entry in Merger Analysis
Competition and Consumer Protection Enforcement: Aiming Toward a Common Goal in the Emerging Global Marketplace
Report from the Bureau of Competition: Looking Back and Going Forward
Automatic Data Processing, Inc., United States of America (For the FTC)
ADP Agrees To Pay Maximum $2.97 Million Civil Penalty for Withholding Key Competitive Documents from Federal Antitrust Agencies
California Dental Association
Horizontal Price-Fixing in Cyberspace
Displaying 4741 - 4760 of 5085