Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.1(b); Item 5
Staff
Andrew Scanlon
Response/Comments
5/22/86- advised (redacted) that I agree with the content of this letter.

Question

(redacted)

May 21, 1987

Andrew Scanlon
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Mr. Scanlon:

The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge and confirm our telephone conversation today concerning your responses to my letter to you dated May 7, 1987 and attached herewith. With respect to my first question in that letter, you stated today that a partnership which is 99% owned by a particular person and 1% owned by an irrevocable trust in favor of that persons children, would not be considered controlled by that person provided that, (i) the trustee is not within that person; (ii) that person cannot remove and replace the trustee at will; and (iii) the partnership was not established for purposes of avoiding compliance with the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act in violation of Section 801.90 of the FTC interpretative rules.

With respect to the second question in my letter to you, you stated today your prior response tome was in error because natural persons investment revenues must be reported under an appropriate SIC Code. You further stated that the proper SIC Code Number would be 6799, Investors Not Otherwise Classified. As we discussed, Section 5(a) of the Hart-Scott-Rodino form requires such revenues to be reported regardless of amount, for 1982. Section 5(c) requires such revenues to be reported for the most recent year, provided such amounts are in excess of $1 million. You stated that the sources of the investment revenues do not have to be disclosed. Your authority for requiring a natural person to report investment revenues is the ABA Manual entitled Premerger Notification Practice Manual, which is a collection and discussion of informal interpretations of the Federal Trade Commission. Sections 91 and 181 provide the specific authority for your conclusions.

You stated to me that you would be able to confirm the accuracy of this letter by a telephone call to me promptly upon your receipt hereof.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Very truly yours,

(Redacted)

(Redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.