Skip to main content

Refine your results

Filters
Search
Include spaces in matter number if applicable. Ex.: 182 3125
Date
Displaying 43521 - 43540 of 44620
HSR Informal Interpretations

8609008 Informal Interpretation

… 8609008 Informal Interpretation 8609008 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … our telephone conversation of August 27, 1986, regarding the inapplicability of the premerger notification requirements of the …
Date
Rule
802.63
If bonafide financing deal this is exempt under 802.63. AS W.K. concurs.
HSR Informal Interpretations

8608005 Informal Interpretation

… 8608005 Informal Interpretation 8608005 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … Dear Mr. Kaplan: At your suggestion, I have put in writing the factual scenario we discussed in our August 8 telephone … conversation and have outlined our analysis regarding the applicability of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust …
Date
Rule
801.10; 801.40; 802.20
No written response will be given. A must determine in good faith fair market value of the v.s. of X it will obtain and if below $15.0MM in value then none of above transactions appear to be...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8608007 Informal Interpretation

… 8608007 Informal Interpretation 8608007 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … Sharpe: This will confirm your telephonic advice today that the following transaction satisfies the minimum value exemption and is not reportable. A. a …
Date
Rule
7A(a)(3)
I concur Patrick Sharpe. Called (redacted) 8-22-86 Andy concurs. Upon later review, the letter appears to ignore the PMN position that any direct assumption of liabilities bargained for between the...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8608008 Informal Interpretation

… 8608008 Informal Interpretation 8608008 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … of Wednesday, August 20, 1986, I hereby request that the Pre-Merger Notification Office of the Federal Trade Commission determine that A Corp. is the …
Date
Rule
801.1(a)(3)
See Page 3 for Graphic Illustration
HSR Informal Interpretations

8608010 Informal Interpretation

… 8608010 Informal Interpretation 8608010 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … and availability of exemptions under, 1[5] U.S.C. 18a (and the regulation promulgated thereunder) in connection with a proposed acquisition of …
Date
Rule
802.20
This transaction (or transactions) exempt under 802.20 Called (redacted) 8-26-86
HSR Informal Interpretations

8608013 Informal Interpretation

… 8608013 Informal Interpretation 8608013 Informal Interpretation … of August 21, 1986. (Redacted) is negotiating to purchase the assets of a company in Florida which operates a number … are of two types. Retail consumer credit collection is handled for the company by a bank and will continue to be so …
Date
Rule
801.1
[W]hat (redacted) collects in excess of receivables less reserve for bad debt will be for (redacted) account. (Redacted) has to guarantee the receivables. It sounds to me like (redacted) is acquiring...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8608012 Informal Interpretation

… 8608012 Informal Interpretation 8608012 Informal Interpretation Dana … and a “foreign issuer” as defined in Section 801.1 of the Rules, Regulations, Statements and Interpretations (the “Rules”) under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Act of …
Date
Rule
802.51
No Comments
HSR Informal Interpretations

8607011 Informal Interpretation

… 8607011 Informal Interpretation 8607011 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … bank holding company acquisitions as described in the exemptions set forth in Subsections (7) and (8) of Section 7A(c) of the Clayton Act. I. THE FACTS. As I indicated to you during …
Date
Rule
7A(c)(7); 7A(c)(8)
Response: Advised the Above on Aug. 1, 1986 that I agree. Andy Upon later review this appears to be in error regarding the submission of documentary info. for that portion of the transaction subject...
Advocacy Filings

FTC Staff Comment Before the Hawaii Office of the Auditor Concerning the Sunset Review of Statutory Provisions Prohibiting Certain Business Practices by Optometrists

… FTC Staff Comment Before the Hawaii Office of the Auditor Concerning the Sunset Review of Statutory Provisions Prohibiting Certain Business Practices by Optometrists Submitted by …
Date
Matter Number
P864663
Advocacy Filings

FTC Staff Comment Before the Council of the District of Columbia Concerning C.B. 6-442, The Wine, Beer, and Spirits Franchise Act of 1986

… FTC Staff Comment Before the Council of the District of Columbia Concerning C.B. 6-442, The Wine, Beer, and Spirits Franchise Act of 1986 Submitted by …
Date
Matter Number
P864665
Advocacy Filings

FTC Staff Comment Before the Chicago City Council Committee on Local Transportation Concerning Regulation of Taxis

… FTC Staff Comment Before the Chicago City Council Committee on Local Transportation Concerning Regulation of Taxis Submitted by wfg-adm109 on August 1, … City Council Committee on Local Transportation Concerning Regulation of Taxis p864664.pdf Advocacy Filing … FTC …
Date
Matter Number
P864664
Advocacy Filings

FTC Staff Comment Before the Council of the District of Columbia Concerning C.B. 6-442, The Wine, Beer, and Spirits Franchise Act of 1986

… FTC Staff Comment Before the Council of the District of Columbia Concerning C.B. 6-442, The Wine, Beer, and Spirits Franchise Act of 1986 Submitted by …
Date
Matter Number
P864665
Advocacy Filings

FTC Staff Comment Before the Chicago City Council Committee on Local Transportation Concerning Regulation of Taxis

… FTC Staff Comment Before the Chicago City Council Committee on Local Transportation Concerning Regulation of Taxis Submitted by wfg-adm109 on August 1, … City Council Committee on Local Transportation Concerning Regulation of Taxis p864664.pdf Advocacy Filing … FTC …
Date
Matter Number
P864664
Amicus Briefs

Stanley N. Parker, D.M.D. v. Kentucky Board of Dentistry

… v. Kentucky Board of Dentistry FTC amicus curiae brief in Stanley N. Parker, D.M.D. v. Kentucky Board of Dentistry concerning use of certain terms in dentist advertising. Amicus Brief …
Date
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
FTC amicus curiae brief in Stanley N. Parker, D.M.D. v. Kentucky Board of Dentistry concerning use of certain terms in dentist advertising.
Displaying 43521 - 43540 of 44620
Return to top