Skip to main content
Date

Tags:

Rule
801.2(e)
Staff
Kate Walsh
Response/Comments

Analyze potential backside filing requirements (801.2(e)) based on where the entities stand before the main transaction.  

Question

From: Walsh, Kathryn E.
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 3:09 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Interpretation Question Regarding Rule 802.10

You analyze companies as they stand before the transaction.  So, here any backside filing would be exempt under 802.4 because all X holds is cash and cash equivalents. 

From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 11:33 AM
To: Walsh, Kathryn E.
Subject: Interpretation Question Regarding Rule 802.10

Hi Kate,

We are analyzing whether there is the need for a potential backside filing based on the facts below and we would appreciate your insight.

Corporation X is a blank check development stage company. Corporation X was formed as public company for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses or assets. Corporation X is a “shell company” as defined under Regulation M under the Exchange Act of 1934 because Corporation X has no operations and nominal assets consisting solely of cash and/or cash equivalents. Corporation X generated less than $0.5 million of non-operating income in the form of interest on cash and cash equivalents from the proceeds derived from the Public Offering in the most recent fiscal year.

Corporation X will be acquiring all of the non-corporate interests of Company ABC.  Certain Company ABC non-corporate interest holders will receive in excess of $78.2 million of Corporation X voting securities as partial consideration for the transaction; however, no such rollover holder will have a per centum increase in its indirect ownership of  Company ABC (i.e., indirect ownership of Company ABC through Corporation X) as a result of the transaction. The only operations within Corporation X will be the non-operating interest income generated by Corporation X and that of Company ABC. A filing will be required for Corporation X to acquire Company ABC.

Given the above, do you agree that the ABC non-corporate holders receiving in excess of $78.2 million of Corporation X voting securities do not have a backside filing obligation pursuant to 16 CFR 802.10?  Please see https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/premerger-notification-program/informal-interpretations/0904003.

We very much appreciate your assistance.

Best regards,

[REDACTED]

 

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from PNO staff on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. They do not necessarily reflect the position of the Commission. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice. 

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.