Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.21
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Notwithstanding the position taken 2001, the PNO will treat subsidiaries as different issuers from the parent for purposes of 802.21. Any acquisition of a subsidiaries v/s is potentially reportable if the value exceeds $50MM. The obvious exception is if the filing for the parent was for a controlling interest. N. Ovuka and M Bruno concur.

Question

From: (redacted)
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 4:17 PM
To: Verne,B. Michael
Cc: (redacted)


Subject: acquiring voting securities of a sub after clearance with respect toparent

Thanks for speaking with us this morning.

Again, our facts are as follows:

1. Our client has already filed an HSR at the$500 million threshold for buying the voting securities of the acquired personof which P is the ultimate parent entity. The waiting period has expired sothat our client is free to buy up to one share less than 25/a of P.Although item 3(c) of our clients HSR formdescribes a purchase of voting securities of the issuer P, in our view the formcovers the entire acquired person of which P is the ultimate parent entity andin particular covers S, a 55% sub of P (the 45l0 of S not held by P tradespublicly). After all, S's revenues were included in the consolidated revenuesthe acquired person reported in its filing.

2. Our client is now interested in possibly acquiring more than $50 million ofvoting securities of S. Example 2 of the attached interpretation that we foundon the FTC website seems to be on point and would seem to allow our client tobuy voting securities of S since we are clear to buy up to one share less than25% of the acquired person of which S is a part.

We think that the way to run the math in applying the 25% threshold is to saywe need to file before crossing the point where the combined percentageownership interests in P and S hits 25% (or 50% if the value of the securitiesis less than $1 billion). For example, if our client owns 4.9% of P it would beable to buy another 20% of S (or 45% if the value is less than $1 billion)before triggering another filing. This makes sense to us because S and P are,for HSR purposes, synonymous given that Pcontrols S (and for that reason a 4.9% interest in P is the same for HSR purposes as a 4.9% interest in S so that our client would onlyhave room for another 20% or 45% of S).

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from PNO staff on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. They do not necessarily reflect the position of the Commission. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice. 

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.