Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Displaying 1841 - 1860 of 2685
Date
Matter Number
031 0245
File
Closing Letter to Counsel for Harrah's
(36.05 KB)
File
Closing Letter to Counsel for Horseshoe
(36.01 KB)
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
P042115
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
032-3209
Docket Number
C-4110
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
022-3219
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
X030044
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
X030062
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
012 3248
Docket Number
C-4108
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
012-3192
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
X000012
Date
By
Thomas B. Leary, Former Commissioner
Matter Number
031 0191
Docket Number
9316
The complaint alleged that RHI violated various provisions of an FTC order issued in 2001. According to the complaint, the 2001 order was issued pursuant to a 1999 consent agreement with RHI that followed the FTC’s investigation of RHI’s acquisition of Global Industrial Technologies, Inc., and resolved concerns that the acquisition would decrease competition in North American markets for refractory bricks used to line steel-making equipment. The order, as drafted in 1999, required RHI to divest to Resco Products, Inc. two refractories plants and other assets in Canada and the United States in a manner set out in contracts between Resco and NARCO, an RHI subsidiary. However, before the order became final, the FTC determined, in 2000, that NARCO failed to divest all of the requisite assets to Resco. The complaint also charged that NARCO manufactured refractory bricks in violation of a patent license that was part of the order, and in violation of specific order language. Finally, the complaint asserted that NARCO modified the settlement agreement with Resco without FTC approval. Under the terms of the final judgment, RHI agreed to pay a civil penalty of at least $650,000 for the violations and to conduct asbestos remediation at a divested plant.
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
0210105
Docket Number
C-4005
Displaying 1841 - 1860 of 2685