Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
United States of America, Plaintiff, v. KB Home (previously "Kaufman and Broad, Inc." and "Kaufman and Broad Home Corporation") Defendant, Civil Action No. 91-0872K (BTM)
Proposed Acquisition by Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. of Hancor Holding Corporation From Citigroup, Inc.
USS Elder Enterprises, Inc.
APC Entertainment, Inc., et al., US
BangBros.com, Inc., et al., US vs
Impulse Media Group, Inc., et al., US vs
MD Media, Inc., et al., US vs
Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Vulcan Materials Company, In the Matter of
Nestle Holdings, Inc.; Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Holdings, Inc.; and Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
The Commission authorized staff to seek a preliminary injunction to block the merger of Nestlé and Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream, Inc. on grounds that the merger would reduce competition in the highly concentrated market for super-premium ice cream. Nestlé markets super-premium ice cream under the Häagen Dazs brand; Dreyer’s super-premium brands include Dreamery, Godiva and Starbucks. Before the complaint was filed in a federal district court, the parties agreed to enter into a consent agreement to settle the charges. The final order requires the divestiture of super-premium ice cream brands Dreamery and Godiva, the Whole Fruit sorbet brand, and Nestlé’s distribution assets to CoolBrands International, Inc.
Alyon Technologies, Inc. (Northern Dist. Georgia), FTC
Money Movers, Inc., et al., US
4049705 Canada Inc., et al.
AVS Marketing, Inc., et al.
New Millennium Orthopaedics, LLC; et al., In the Matter of
The Commission settled charges with two small groups of orthopedic physicians in the Cincinnati area that had formed an independent practice association that jointly negotiated contracts regarding the rates its physician members would charge health plans and other payors for their services. In addition to the usual prohibitions on joint negotiations, the Commission’s order disbanded the IPA and prohibited future collective bargaining.
Omnicare, Inc. and NeighborCare, Inc., in the Matter of
Arch Coal, Inc., New Vulcan Coal Holdings, LLC, and Triton Coal Company, LLC, In the Matter of
The Commission authorized staff to file a complaint to block Arch Coal, Inc.’s proposed acquisition of Triton Coal Company, L.L.C. from New Vulcan Holdings, L.L.C. on grounds that the acquisition would increase concentration and tend to create a monopoly in the market for coal mined from the Southern Powder River Basin and in the production of 8800 British Thermal Unit coal. On April 1, 2004, the complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; the court denied the FTC's motion for a preliminary injunction. On June 13, 2005 the Commission announced that it was closing its investigation, saying that it will not continue with administrative litigation challenging the deal.