Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Farley, William F., United States of America (For the FTC)
Anova Holding AG, Stephan Schmidheiny, and Unotec Holding AG, United States of America (For the FTC)
Honickman, Harold A., United States of America (For the FTC)
Beazer PLC, United States of America (For the FTC)
General Cinema Corporation, United States of America (For the FTC)
Atlantic Richfield Company and U.F. Genetics, Inc., United States of America (For the FTC)
Aero Limited Partnership, United States of America (For the FTC)
Coastal Corporation, United States of America (For the FTC)
Qargo Coffee, Inc., et al., FTC v.
The Federal Trade Commission has taken action against coffee shop franchise Qargo Coffee and its founders for failing to disclose critical information required by the Franchise Rule, including one founder’s ties to burger franchise BurgerIM, leaving prospective franchisees in the dark when deciding whether to invest in the franchise.
In its complaint, the FTC alleged that Qargo and founders Mark Bastorous, Bernadette Bastorous, and Samir Shenouda violated the FTC’s Franchise Rule—the agency’s second case in recent years alleging violations of the Franchise Rule.
Under proposed order, the company and its founders are required to pay $30,000, provide franchisees the right to rescind contracts, and void noncompete agreements.