Skip to main content

The FTC is closed due to the lapse in funding

Learn about the status of FTC online services and website information updates during the lapse in funding.

QT, Inc.; Q-Ray Company, et al.

Tags:

Last Updated

May 6, 2011

Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.; Q-Ray, Company; Bio-Metal, Inc.; Que Te Park, also known as Andrew Q. Park; and Jung Joo Park

FTC Matter/File Number

032 3011

Civil Action Number

03C 3578

Case Timeline

May 6, 2011

PRESS RELEASE: FTC Returns More Than $11.8 Million to Consumers Defrauded by Q-Ray Bracelet Scam

January 7, 2008

Court of Appeals Opinion Affirming the Final Judgment Order of the District Court (127.05 KB)

PRESS RELEASE: Appeals Court Affirms Ruling in FTCs Favor in Q-Ray Bracelet Case

January 22, 2007

Memorandum Opinion and Order (61.95 KB)

November 13, 2006

Final Judgment Order (153.75 KB)

September 20, 2006

Memorandum Opinion and Order (498.1 KB)

PRESS RELEASE: Court Rules In FTC's Favor In Q-Ray Bracelet Case; Orders Defendants To Pay Up To $87 Million

June 2, 2003

Complaint for Injunctive and Other Equitable Relief (520.23 KB)

Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order With Asset Freeze and Other Equitable Relief (561.28 KB)

PRESS RELEASE: Marketers of Q-Ray Ionized Bracelet Charged by FTC