Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.

Displaying 101 - 120 of 4382

Pages

1910004 Informal Interpretation

Staff:
Nora Whitehead
Rule:
802.4

Response/Comments

We agree with your stated conclusions. With regard to “property and equipment,” we encourage you to perform an 802.1/802.2 analysis to determine whether any such property or equipment is exempt.
application/pdf icon Original Image (129.46 KB)

1910007 Informal Interpretation

Staff:
Timothy Carson
Rule:
802.51

Response/Comments

Below are responses to your numbered questions: 1. Agree 2. Agree 3. Agree it is reasonable to include in the aggregate sales in or into the US 100% of the revenue, even if the flight is a layover...
application/pdf icon Original Image (111.55 KB)

1908001 Informal Interpretation

Staff:
Sam Sheinberg
Rule:
Item 5, 803.1

Response/Comments

An acquiring person must make an HSR filing for a pending transaction. The acquiring person reports revenues in various industries, but the transaction has the following overlaps: 311119 Other Animal...
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document icon Original Image (17.91 KB)

1909002 Informal Interpretation

Staff:
Vesselina Musick
Rule:
803.2

Response/Comments

Please see 803.6 (4) regarding certification where the UPE is a natural person. A can authorize B to make the filing. A’s name and address will be listed in Item 1(a), B’s name and address will be...
application/pdf icon Original Image (107.47 KB)

1909001 Informal Interpretation

Staff:
Nora Whitehead
Rule:
802.9, 802.51

Response/Comments

A foreign party itself (with its counsel) is often in the best position to determine whether it is appropriately categorized as a corporate or non-corporate entity, based on the guidance in our 2016...
application/pdf icon Original Image (116.99 KB)

1908002 Informal Interpretation

Staff:
Nora Whitehead
Rule:
802.9

Response/Comments

Exemption under Rule 802.9 is not necessarily precluded by the facts you present. However, because intent is factual inquiry, the acquiring person will need to make the final call and be prepared to...
application/pdf icon Original Image (80.26 KB)

1908006 Informal Interpretation

Staff:
Anne Six
Rule:
Item 4(c)

Response/Comments

Yes, this is still the FTC’s position. Material unrelated to a proposed transaction may be redacted from responsive Board minutes (the official approved recaps of business that occurred at a Board...
application/pdf icon Original Image (106.81 KB)

1908004 Informal Interpretation

Staff:
Anne Six
Rule:
802.9

Response/Comments

Under these facts, 802.9 doesn’t apply. If the client begins to accumulate shares, it will have to file before it crosses a statutory size of transaction threshold, assuming the other statutory tests...
application/pdf icon Original Image (141.87 KB)

1907001 Informal Interpretation

Staff:
Timothy Carson
Rule:
801.2, 803.9

Response/Comments

Responses below corresponding to your questions: 1. Yes, but it generally avoids errors and confusion to submit a form for each UPE in this type of scenario 2. One filing fee is due on these facts 3...
application/pdf icon Original Image (81.95 KB)

1907002 Informal Interpretation

Staff:
Nora Whitehead
Rule:
803.5

Response/Comments

The proposed acquisition you describe necessitates a new filing (with the appropriate fee), not an amendment. It would be helpful to reference the prior filing in either an end note or in the text of...
application/pdf icon Original Image (96.19 KB)

Pages